My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6525 HARDESON RD BASE FILE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HARDESON RD
>
6525
>
BASE FILE
>
6525 HARDESON RD BASE FILE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 11:35:32 AM
Creation date
2/20/2017 10:57:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARDESON RD
Street Number
6525
Tenant Name
BASE FILE
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Gordon Witcher, Bill L.ong <br />FROM: Mary Cunningham �0�( <br />V <br />DATE: October 24, 1997 <br />SUBIECT: Intracorp/King Extcu.:ions Project (SEPA k2697) <br />Fast of Hardeson Road <br />Attached is a revised si�e plan for King Extrusions. The plan was modified to <br />• Provide a 25 foot buffer along the east (Associated Sand and Gravel) property line <br />• Remove patking along the east end of the building <br />• Provide replaced parking along the nonh propetty line and on the southeast end of the building. <br />Please let me know if this plan is acceptable and if it changes any of your previous comments on the <br />proposal. f will issue the Planned Action determination as soon as I hear from you. <br />Note to Gordon: Wayne provided comments to me modifying the traffic mitigation fee required for <br />this proposal. The previous fee was based on their traffic study, which proposed development of the <br />entire lot with 3 buildings. Their revised application was for a binding site plan creating 3 lots and <br />development on the nonhern lot only, but they never revised the traffic study. The building on the <br />nonhern lot is much larger than proposed in the traffic study also (122,500 vs. 9'1,500). Wayne <br />revised the fee to $101,259. <br />a <br />� <br />,� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.