Laserfiche WebLink
rcquircmcnt uf 3,�00 gpm ur grcatcr. 'I hc additional anal}sis nmy bc as simplc as calculations complMcd by the <br />Public \Vorks Dcpartmcnt prior to a prc-application mecling un a spccific dcvclopment proposal. "I'hc additional <br />analysis must dcicnnine how thc propos�il's waler demand �vill affcct Ihe cntirc water supply and distribution <br />system. Projects tvith no additional major improvemenis needed and no adverse cuntulalive itnpacts on the n•ater <br />supply and distribution systcm arc covcrcd by this analysis. <br />I he 2.7 epndacrc is an ovcrall avcrage pcak hour demand assumed for planning in large arcas such as the study <br />area. lio�ccvcr, �hcrc will undoubtcdly bc silo-spccific proposals wiih largcr dcmand. For esamplc, largc irrigation <br />syslcros can cxceed 50 epm/acre dcmand. Olhcr land uses �� ilh dem�nds much lo�ecr than 2J epnilacrc, such as <br />warehouses, are assumed lo occur to ol7'set thc liigher demand I�md uses, resulting in an ovenll .�rea wide average of <br />2.� Lhm���rc. <br />fhe impacts of consuvclion of the ne�r �vater line Iu service devclopment �vest of.lapanese Gulch ��cre not coeered <br />in thc BIS. Additional 513PA nnalysis is rcyuircd lo rc��ic�v ;ihcrnalivc roules for thc linc which will minimizc Ihc <br />impac�s of �hc proposal. <br />R.C.3 Miligalinn Uc:isures <br />Nanc <br />SJ 51'sW1iR <br />N.7.1 'I'hreshnld <br />Cap�city of thc system is 1,700 gallons per gross acrc per day, :md 4,OU0 gallons per gross acrc per day of <br />insumtancous pcak flow. <br />Some ciies may ha��e capaciry in escess ofihe ihreshold availabie to serve pmeniial users. Ifa proposal ��ould <br />cscccJ 1,700 gallons per gross acrc per day and/or 4,000 gallons per gross acrc per day ol' instantancous pcak Ilo�v, <br />adJiiion:d anal� sis �vill bc rcquircd. "I'hc :III(IIlIOI1f1I :IO�Iy515 tll:ly VC �S SII11�lIC as calculotions completcd by thc <br />Public \Vorks Dcparuncnt prior to a pro-applicalion mccting on a spccific dcvclopment proposal. 1'hc addition;il <br />analysis musl detcrminc how the proposal's sc��cr demand will affcct the sc�ecr sysicm. Projccts �vith no additional <br />major improvcments nccdcd and no nd��crsc cumulaiivc impacls on tlic sc���cr systcm arc wvcred by Ihis analysis. <br />Addilional SI:PA analysis �eill be requircd I'or projccts that may rcquire major improvemcros not identified in the <br />GIS or Ihat m;ry havc ;uh�crsc cumulalivc impacts on Ihc sc�vcr systcm. <br />I he I:IS an;dysis does not cover �he impac�s of construc�ion of a uew sc���er main across Japanesc Gulch. Additional <br />an;dysis is rcquircd to rcvicw alicncilicc routcs 1'or thc linc �cliich ���ill minimizc ihc impacls of Ihc proposal, or <br />altcrn;uivc nuans o(providing scwcrs to Ihat arca. <br />Y.7.3111iti;;alion \Ir�s�n•cs <br />Nunc <br />O'1'IIF.R RI'sQUIRF.�9GV7:S <br />A lraflic mitigation fcc of $�?��AO is duc prior to issuancc of constructiai pcnnits. <br />"1'hc application lor construction permits shall vcrily Uic actual sc�uarc lootagc oCthc <br />proposcd slurngc arc;i. 'I'hc inibnnntion on filc shows an inconsistcncy bet��ccn thc <br />huilding c�tcrior dimcnsions (�l2' x 137' _ �.7�4 squarc f'cct) aud proposed arca of 6,930 <br />syuarc Icct. <br />