Laserfiche WebLink
; <br />w <br />I� <br />�a <br />'� <br />A <br />lo <br />cw <br />w� <br />'f <br />� <br />hl <br />!� <br />c� <br />tr <br />Ii <br />tt <br />�� <br />�s <br />i� <br />� <br />Soil bioengineering techniques have been used extensively in Europe but until recently <br />have been less commonly applied in the United States. Robbin B. Sotir & Associates (RSA), <br />an internationally recognized specialty soil bioengineering firm, may be used as a design <br />consultant if soil bioengineering solutions are selected for the project. <br />Soil bicengineering diffecs trom revegetation in that the former provides immediate <br />streambank sWbility; that is, there is no necai to wait several growing seasons to allow for <br />adequate root development, as is the case with revegetaHon. Bank stability u accomplished <br />by placing plant materials in a con(iguration whereby the stems and trunks of cuttings <br />pmvide protection from erosion for streambanks and slopes. For this project, furiher short- <br />term stability (flve to 10 years) will be provide.i by the use of natural geotextile fabrics that <br />have been included in the design. <br />Approximately 825 feet of the existing channel µould be restored within a 60-foot <br />corridor adjacent to Hardeson Road. Approximately 2801ineal feet of tlie southern portion of <br />the existing channel would be relocated closer to Hardeson Road. Therefore, this section of <br />the channel would need to be recreated. The balance of the channel would be restored in <br />pla:e, with limited or no relocation from the existing course. The channel would be graded to <br />match the proposed channel restoration and realignment project to the north. <br />The width of the stream cottidor and the channel configuration wouid vary depending <br />upon whether the channel is relocated and restored or only restored. in the relocated sectior., ,} •�` <br />the stream corridor would be 10 to 15 feet wide and approximately 2 feet deep with a stream ;'�� �' <br />channel5 feet in width (Figure 2).�In the restored reach, the existing stream course would betc�° �^� <br />preserved, aithough addition of an overElow channel 'u probably necessary to reduce Flood (�� �'' � <br />depttu and convey the 100-year Flood1The exact conflguration of the channel, in both , <br />�vµ i' . <br />reaches, will be determined during flnal design. Figures 3 and 4 present a range of possible � r�� ���; �� <br />cross-sections for the proposed stream corridor. ��� �_ „��� <br />i A The restored stream channel is expected to be equal in length to the existing channel. <br />�y The stream corridor would be vegetated to form a thick stand of native vegetation that <br />�� shades the stream, and provides wildlife habitat. Trees, rather than shrubs are et�np asized <br />`j in the planting efforts ro reduce the potential for decreasing channel conveyance capacity. <br />i` The channel gradient would be spproximately 2.5 to 3.0 percent. Near lhe north property <br />� line, the sewer line will be protected by placing rock or a structure; details wiil be developed <br />during the fuial design process. If the banks in this short reach are to be lined with rock to <br />, y resist erosion, joint planting with live stakes may be incorporated to establish vegetation. <br />pa <br />� <br />7 <br />� <br />