Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Pir. Kenneth W. Callahan <br />Page Two <br />SeptemUer 21, 1981 <br />c) Uninspecced panels Ii104 6 105 are typical retaining wall panels along <br />grid 7. Panels 102 & 103 which are immediately adjacent and which required <br />identical reinforcing were inspected Che samc day. Tl�e only deficiency <br />noted on l'l�e inspected panels was the omi.s�ion of 3 or 4 ot the horizcntal <br />JS Uars. There is somc question as to whethcr tlie prop,r Uars werc installed <br />prior to the concrete pour. This i.s a relatively small portion of the <br />reinforcing in the wall and since che bacic[ill I�as Ueen placed and compacted <br />Uehind the wall without dis[ress co the �anll we don't fecl that remedial <br />action is required. Note also that Plr, ldally Christopherson ot the 13vcrett <br />6uilding Department had obscrved Che panels and had pointed ou[ Che missing <br />Uars to the Cascade Testing Laboratory inspecl'or. <br />2. a) See accompanyi.ng calcula[ion sheets Dl and D2, tJNP-2 Threaded Roct Test, <br />revised details on sheet SK4, and calcula[ion shcets W20 thru W28 which <br />are for the 5-1/2" panels. See also enclosed Adhesive Lngineering Company <br />Technical Data Shects. <br />b) Note that alon� grid H dowcls project out of the panels, on ona side only, <br />into a 1'-0"t wide closure s,ri�,. The plans called for dowels on both <br />sides into a�aider closure stri.p. Since there will be a concrete slaU on <br />each side preven[ing motion of the boctom o[ the panel by direcC compression <br />in �he concrete, additonal clowels are noc required. The closure strips may <br />Ue placed without any reinforcing. <br />3. To verify the in place s�rength of the concretc in panels Nos. 54, 55, 56, <br />57, 58, 59, 112, 113, ].14, 115 S 116, Schmid� ilammer 'Cests will be performed <br />on each of these panels. 7'he �ests will be performed by a teclmician from <br />Associated S;ind S Gravel in che comp�ny of an approved special inspector. <br />The special inspecCor shal_1 report the resulcs to all parties who norm�l.ly <br />receive conctieCe Cest reporCs, i.ncludin}; thc livereCl' Iiuildin� Department. and <br />Che Structural L•'nginecr. NoCe thnC Lor Chese panels the required s[reng[h <br />is 3000 psi and that thc cylinders avcraged 4945 psi. <br />4. Cunversations with Che inspector from Cascacic Tesling T.aUoru[ory l�ave <br />determined thac the area where [he !I8 :1R(j O�I U1C5 wcre reversed was grid N, <br />Uetween gr�ids 7 and 8. InPormation from che conCrncCor sliows che actual <br />field conctition is as indicated on enclosed calcul.ation sheet RSd--12. The <br />lateral forces arc carried by che horizontall.y spanni.ng W111 co grid 7& S. <br />At grid 7 che forces arc L'ransmitCed direcCly ia:o t.io perpendicular re[aining <br />wall as indicated on tlre revised detail 25g�, which is enclosed on sheet <br />S}:7. At grid 8 the forces arc Cransferred through the pilasCer to Che <br />foo[ing. 'Phe step in tl�c Poo[in� 3' norCl. ot' grid 8 makes Che Eaoting where <br />the Uars were reversed useless as ❑ horizonC�lly spanni_ng Ucam. 'fhe calcula- <br />Cions on RW-12, however, sho�a tl�a[ L'I�c fooCi.ng as iC exists, south oP the <br />sCep, is cap�ble of ❑dequaCely distributing the lateral force inCo Che <br />soi.l. No remedial acti.on i.s roquired at Cl�e [owtdation. <br />J <br />J <br />