Laserfiche WebLink
pn�fer ro let the truss designer to select the specific hanser for proper applicution. <br />19. Please find ihat new note reading :" wrap bm. w/ 5/8" GWB type `X"' satisfies your <br />concems regarding livin� area separation. <br />This beam is held at the wcst end by an GCCQ 7.1-6SDS2.5 (atop a 6x6 DF2 post), as specified <br />on plan. The east end is secured by conventional framing, sitting atop 4 studs, held by trimmers <br />at sides (as per rypical code-compliant framing) and the fl�or loads from above. <br />20. Please see that spiral stair has been changed from 3'-G" to 5'-0" dia., and that a detail has been <br />added to dictate the dimensions critical to codu compliance. Please see sheet 7 for the new detail <br />("A") and the changed stair at main floor level, and sheet 9 for the stair at basement level. <br />21. The deck i� question is actually supported by a post and beam arrengement, and is not <br />cantilevered. We have added a post to the detail, as well as a callout for the critical floor height <br />dimension, for grcater clarity (see Detail C, shect t9). Please also note that tlie deck and patio <br />below have been enlarged to accommodate the changed spiral staircase (please sec sheets 7& 9). <br />22. Your concerns here arc duly noted! Please sce new drawing titled "Rouf Praming Plan," sheet <br />C-1, for greater clarity, and note the resultant changes on sheet 8. <br />23. Header and bcam sizes abovc the three openings in question are as follows, read from lefi to <br />right (or, roughly, south to north): "4 x 6 DF!!2 ," " G.L. 3 1/S" x 9" 24P-V4," and "4 x 8 <br />DF#2,"this last being the header over the paired doors to balcony. Please see sheet 11. I have also <br />included our calcs for these items, titled (in the s�une ordcr) "fireplace wdw hdr," "liv wdw hdr," <br />and "din dr hdr." Plc:ise sec attachment. <br />24. Maximum tloon c�ight diflerencc is now callcd out at 1'/z' �vith solid shimming bclow, as <br />needed. Please see Delail P, shL 20. <br />Please allow a deferment on the design of the iron rail until design can be submitted by the <br />manufucturcr of said itcm. <br />25. Discrepancy regarding said door is noted! Please see that this door is now univeraally a slider, <br />and th�t all panes in ths assembly are now notcd as safety glazing required. See sheet 10. <br />26. Apulogics for thc c:owded note. The beam is actually specified :" G.L. 5 1/8" x 18" 24F-V4 <br />x 20' (exposed):' We have re-wriuen the note for better readability (see sheet 16). As per the <br />elevAtions, sheet 15, the tloor-to-plate height on this floor is nine feet, less 18" gives us 7'-6" <br />clear under the bea�n. Sorry for the confusion. <br />27. Notc added. Pleuse see affected door, sheet 16. <br />28. Landing has bcen added, and stairways adjusted to accommodate. Please see sheet 16. <br />Please find that your concerns have becn addressed. Let us know if you have any questions or <br />further conccrns. <br />