Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />February 15, 2005 <br />Page 5 <br />Phase 5: Construct the new tower which would be the neighbor to the Oakes Avenue homes. <br />Reid Shockey, Shockey Brent, Inc., 2716 Colby Avenue, stated that he was the planning and <br />permitting consultant for PEMC on this project. He was privileged to serve 17 years on the <br />PEMC board and served on the long range planning committee for the board. He explained that <br />as each phase is implemented the specific construction project would be brought to the City for <br />its own review against the master plan. There will be a SEPA review conducted of each phase <br />of construction. SEPA review requires public notice providing additional opportunity to comment <br />on each phase. Mr. Shockey stated that the proposal is consistent with the growth <br />management act, consistent with the 1994 comprehensive plan, and the changed conditions <br />that prompt PEMC's request for a planned amendment. <br />Mr. Shockey stated that there were decisions made in the past that had lead up to PEMC's <br />current request. He felt that the request was entirely consistent with a 25 -year history with the <br />City's Planning Commission, City Council, and Historical Commission. In 1986, the <br />Comprehensive Plan was amended to allow hospital uses on the campus and in 1988, a <br />Special Property Use permit was issued for the Wetmore block. He highlighted an excerpt from <br />the SPU decision finding that the hospital was a necessary public service and that it was <br />recognized that additional services would be necessary to meet future demands in the health <br />care system. Two years earlier when the hospital designation was approved, City Council <br />stated that Block 248 would not be designated for hospital use until a master plan was <br />completed. The City Council did not say that Block 248 would never be used for a hospital. He <br />felt that as early as 1986, a clear tone was set for discussions between the hospital and the <br />community on where future expansion would occur. None of the decisions 17 years ago <br />precluded expansion to block 248. Future expansion was anticipated. <br />In 1998, City Council passed a resolution designating the Donovan District as a historic <br />neighborhood. Up until 1998, the hospital had done all of its planning to that time based on <br />what it felt were instructions a decade or more earlier to base future growth on a master plan <br />and to make its case for growth. The growth needs of the medical center in 1998 did not <br />warrant presentation of either a master plan or a request for expansion but because the <br />Donovan District at that time was being proposed for creation the hospital felt that it needed to <br />make its feelings known. This is testimony before the Historical Commission in 1998 by one of <br />the chief officers of PEMC "hospital officials testified to the Historical Commission in 1998 <br />reminding them of what the comprehensive plan was saying and what actions had been taken <br />by the hospital as a result." As providence indicated they supported the Donovan District but <br />had already purchased 17 homes in block 248 based on past discussions with the City and the <br />community. The response from the Historical Commission was that the hospital should not <br />worry that when a master plan was developed, the issue could be revisited. The hospital was <br />concerned that the intent of the Historical Commission would be forgotten but moved forward as <br />one Historical Commission member said "that the hospital would be treated well once a master <br />plan was created." To insure no misunderstanding, Providence requested clarification from City <br />Council when it took the Donovan District creation under advisement. Providence testified to <br />the City Council that the Historical Commission had indicated that the historical designation' <br />would not have an effect on future expansion plans. Again it was stated that development by <br />the hospital would not be precluded by Donovan District designation. The hospital was <br />reminded that a master plan was still required. Mr. Shockey reiterated that decisions had been <br />made over the past two decades sending a clear message about how to proceed with the <br />hospital master planning. PEMC feels that there is a significant history of assurances that the <br />hospital is proceeding according to the Comprehensive Plan and the wishes of the community. <br />