2931 PANAVIEW BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import

_.. __ _ _ .:=.�. . . September 9, 1974 (cont'd) � , 3. Granting the variance will not be detrimental to .. the surrounding area. 4 . Granting the variance caill not be injurious to the General Comprehensive Plan. A hearing cvas held on the application of Mr. �Valired Johnson, 5502 South Third Ave. , Everett, t9ashington, for a variance from Sec. 15. 04. 080 E.C.C. (Zoning Code) Subsection E, Yard Require- ments for permission to construct a single family residence to within five (5) feet of the north property line rather than the minimum required six (6) feet in an R-1, Single Family Residence Zone. Legal Description: Lots 129 and 130, Valley View, less that � portion of Lot 129, of said plat described as follows : � Beg. at the N.E. Cor. of sd Lot 12Q; thence S 00°25' 13" W ' alq E line of sd Lot 129 for 147. 93 ft. ; thence N ' 77°03 ' 23" W for 262. 62 ft. to tlie S.S�. Cor. sd Lot 129; thence N alg the i� line sd Lot 129 for 3•1 . 14 ft. ; thence . � N 77°32 ' 26" � alg the N line sd Lot 129 for 258. 99 ft. to the P.O.B. , subject to easements of record. �� � Add-ess: 2931 Panaview Boulevard � � Air. Chet Solie, a building contractor, represented Mr. Johnson. r1r. Solie mentioned the rough terrain of the area and that a i five (5) foot setbacY. rather than a six (6) foot would facilitate constzuction of the new dwelling. After visual observation of the subject property and considering all the facts, it was moved by D9r. Inyram, seconded by �1r. Berg, � and unaninwusly carried to _rant the applicant' s request for the following reasons: 1. Because of the topography of the area, the grantin9 of the variance is iiecessary for the applica�it' s . enjo}�nent of his property right�. 2 . Grantinq the variance will not be detrimental to the surrounding area. 3 . There are escepti.onal ci.rcumstances that apply to the subject proper.ty that do not apply to other properties in the same vicinity. -7.-