Laserfiche WebLink
�\pril 11, Iq%�6 <br /> I'otem Electric, In�. <br /> �1:7 �� . Governmeni ' ay <br /> F c:�ttle, �1 aehington 96199 <br /> '�tCention: Ladd C. Smith ,,., i:c�i ��th Yenen�.in �esiue;:ic:; <br /> �±16 k='ecka 1�rive, Evarett, �. �r:l�. <br /> ear Sir: ,__._.____.�„_ <br /> A recheck o[ the eervice anr luad �vas niade at the abuve addrese. 'Ihc <br /> h�use incluciing the vpstaire was :ound to be 1512 eq, ft. instead of the 136�? <br /> yuu figured. You also figured 300) watte for two appliance circuits where <br /> there must be at leaet three including the automatic washer. I'he range mue � <br /> br figured as a 12 KN minimum inatead uf the 10. 7 FC1Y as yuu liave used for <br /> calculation. Using the rest of your :i•,:u. e: � :< you ga,:e c;ien., �„� can o •;.r,h <br /> a 'oad in excesa of 100 amperes. <br /> At the time the plana were s�.,b;::ict:;,: �.�r :� builuir, ,�e.n.it �ne ;:c::, : �,! <br /> c �ntractor wae told the wire size ��•oulu i7;tve to oe inc.eased in the service. <br /> It u.is on this baeis that tne building permit was granted. It is therefore <br /> rr �indatary that the wire size in tl�e service be changed to 150 ampere ratin�, <br /> You also etated the violation of having seven maine would be correct: : <br /> •� zc�in a week. I called h;ra. Hensman during thc writin, oC this letter au�' <br /> s:i� infnrmed me that the corrections have r.ot been i::arc, ,:o� t:;i; i•.;.•,:;;.:. <br /> ca,:. . ,-.cd her for arrangementa to do �o, <br /> �ulc yuu uleasc g?vc tlti ,�o,:r iu-t�.eciau� at[c�r,iu�. :. , _ . , _ . <br /> thi. , , i';. ti �: �e :... . `c: . ( ) , <br /> F :,�ectfull�, <br /> . i. � ?I;!' , <br /> ,. 1��cc;•i� �+i t•,.:• act,�r <br /> n <br />