My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
519 PECKS DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
PECKS DR
>
519
>
519 PECKS DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2017 12:11:18 PM
Creation date
2/24/2017 12:11:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
PECKS DR
Street Number
519
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. <br /> -. <br /> � A hearing was held on the application of t�illiam iv. and Janice <br /> j R. Peterson, 519 Pecks Drive, Everett FIA 98203 for a variancc <br /> from Section 19.1G. 050 Everett t�iunicipnl Code, Yard Requirements, <br /> ' Paragraphs A and B. to allow for a reduction in the front yard <br /> � setback from the code requirement of twenty (20) feet to fifteen <br /> i (15) feet and for a reduction in the side yard setbacks from the <br /> j cod�� requirement of five (5) feet to no (0) feet. <br /> i Legal Descriotion: E 61' of t4 122 ' of S 120' of Tr 7 IIlock 5 <br /> Pecks Bay View Tracts <br /> Address: 519 Pecks Drive Everett, ��A 98203 <br /> Zoning: R-2 Sinqle Family Residence Iiigh Density <br /> , t7r. Peterson represented himself and had nothing more to add to <br /> ; his request. <br /> i ;�ir. Johnson commented for the staff and stated that the City did <br /> � acquire a portion of the front yard for the Pecks Drive street <br /> improvement project, so a hardship does exist on the front yard <br /> � setback. However, the City had some reservations on a zero (0) <br /> � side yard setback. Also a wall caould need to be built to the <br /> � building code standards if any structure is built three (3) feet <br /> or less from the side property line. <br /> � There was sone discussion on the zero (0) side yard setback. ;{ <br /> There was no opposition fromthe audience. � <br /> � After visually viewinq the subject property and hearing all the � <br /> � facts it �aas moved by i•ir. Berg, seconded by hir. Kristiansen and , <br /> Iunar.imously carried to grant the applicant's request as it meets <br /> all the requirer�ents of Section 19.70. 060 Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 9 . <br /> I <br /> IAs a condition to the granting of this variance, the followinq <br /> stipulation suas made: :,+ ..,�,;-;�•:;a.y€ctr�ir�r,; <br /> 1. that the applicant build to e�ithin three (3) feet of the <br /> East property line rather than the five (5) feet the code <br /> requires and the zero (0) feet the applicant requested. <br /> on motion the meeting adjourned at 8: 00 p.m. <br /> � � � <br /> � �. <br /> Jamic G. Johnson, Sc�•�-c °: :�-•;� <br /> ?iO.:��i O: l::_IPS�;l��:i:: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.