519 PECKS DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

February 5, 1979 The reqular meeting of the Everett Board of Adjustment was held at 7 : 00 p.m, in the Auditorium of Roosevelt School, located at Madison and Highland, Everett, WA (the temporary location o.f Cit,y Hall) . Mr, Russell presided; Mr. Kristiansen, Mr. ��ilson, and Air, 2ook were present, Mr Black was absent, Mr. Russell introduced Mr, f4ilson and Mr. Zook, the two new members to the Board, Their terms will expire January 1, 1985. IMr. Russeli read a request from Mr, Peterson who asked for a 120 day extension of his variance which was qranted Tiarch G , 1978. He was granted the 120 day 2xtension which will expire July 6, 1979, A thirty (30) day extension until March 5, 1979 was also granted to �ol�ie F.rickson whose nroperty is locatad at 1801 Wall Street, A hearing was he�id on the application of Northshore Construction Inc, 6306 - 212 SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 for a variance from Section 19. 22. 050 of the Everett Municioal Code, Minimum Lot Size, for pernission to construct a multiple dwelling on a lot with 4, 000 square feet of land area rather than the code reauirement of 5,000 sauare feet of land area, - Legal Description: Lots 9 & 10 Block 741 Everett Land Company's first addition ! Location: 32nd 6 Lombard Northeast corner (a � � pproximatel� 3129 Lombardj � Zoning: R-5 Core Area Residential i•ir. Scott represented Northshore Ce�s+ruc`_=on I-�c. �� ? ;,r�?,_ �}�� statement they would be providina ' - . -_: . :.. ;o ,. ..: _._�c+:: :: , .. �-::: soaces above the required amount . There was some opposition to the � -_..._. .... „_ _.._ . _ _ ...._ . . .. _ reasons were as follows: 1. Pa�king in this area is a problem and the proposed fournle:: would increase that problem. j 2. It is a sub standard lot and this proposal would be cuttinq down the land area too much. Th=_re was a Ietter submitted to the chairman statinq disanoroval of the proposal and a petitior. with fourteen (14) signatur�s, bv the surrounding neighhors, opposing t.he request .was also submitted to the Chairman. There was no further comment from the audience, After visually viewing th�� sabject property and considerina all th� fa=ts and testimony it was �7cved by Hr, Kristiansen, seconded bv t•7r. Zook and unanimously carried to deny the anplic�n`s re�uest as it I (1-)