My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
616 PECKS DR 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
PECKS DR
>
616
>
616 PECKS DR 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2018 9:09:17 AM
Creation date
2/24/2017 12:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
PECKS DR
Street Number
616
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
465
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W My � <br /> R np r s� <br /> Cb <br /> i0 A R1 <br /> C M <br /> � � x [verett School District W-6884 <br /> K � 15 June 1990 Page 4 <br /> � � N 79 <br /> o��GYx�,,l�rers. - <br /> � � � two feet of grass, topsoil or root-laden surfici soils in the proposed building area <br /> H � � southeast of the existing school. The uncontr ed fiil material disclosed at the proposed <br /> � H building location in the courtyard should b overdecorate reveal the underlying dense <br /> � y y to very dense silty sands (Weathered Tili). Due�to the expected variations in thickness <br /> � � and extent of root-laden or uncontrolled fill materiai, we recommend that RZA be allowed <br /> � y to monitor this over-excavation during grading in order to confirm appropriate excavation <br /> depths based on actual conditions encountered in the field. Any existing utilities or <br /> buried fuel or septic tanks within proposed buiiding areas should be removed or <br /> relocated outside the proposed building perimeter. The resulting excavations shouid <br /> then be backfilled up to subgrade elevation with structural fili as described in the <br /> subsequent section of this report. Buried tanks in areas to be paved should be <br /> abandoned according to State and local guidelines. <br /> The suitability of exposed native soils for the support of foundations, floors, walkways, <br /> ���� pavements, or structural fill should be evaluated during construction. We generelly <br /> recommend that all subgrade areas be proofrolled and compacted with a rolier or other <br /> � <br /> suitable heavy equipment as necessary to achieve a firm and non-yielding condition. <br /> 1 1��� However, it should be noted that due to the high silt content of tfie native site soils, such <br /> proofrolling and compaction shouid be done only when the soils are at or very near the <br /> '�� optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content allows the greatest <br /> ! ��.� compacted soil density under a given compactive effort. Furthermore, proofrolling and <br /> compaction of the dense glacial till may be unnecessary and may even lead to <br /> �-1+' degradation of the soils. Consequently, we recommend that an RZA representative <br /> evaluate the need for such subgrade preparation in the fieid at the time of construction. <br /> � !�� � , Because the silty site soils are highly moisture sensitive and susceptible to disturbance <br /> � r when wet, the contractor shouid minimize trarfic over any prepared subgrades areas. <br /> I ! <br /> '��1 Surface water sources around the work areas should be intercepted and diverted prior <br /> ��r to construction. Once the native, silty soils are wet, it may be vary diHicult or impossible <br /> to recompact them. If wet conditions occur during earthwork, a working surface of <br /> quarry spalls or sand and gravel should be placed to protect the native subgrade, <br /> especially from vehicular traffic. Similarly, if groundwater or surface water collects on <br /> surfaces to receive structural (ill, a drainage I���er of quarry spalis or washed rock may <br /> be needed on the wet surface to allow further `iil placement. 8ased on our borings and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.