Laserfiche WebLink
� � � Everett School District W-68F 1 <br /> cy{� N 15 June 1990 Page 8 <br /> H Z N <br /> �< y (� <br /> v <br /> "' y ° all footings be evaivated by an RZA representative prior to placement of gravel, quarry <br /> � � �` spalls, concrete, or structural fill to confirm that the bearing soils are undisturbed and are <br /> °� � o in a condition consistent with recommendations contained within this report. <br /> � :° R <br /> � H <br /> M y Slab-on-Grade Floors <br /> � o y In our opinicn, site conditions are suitabie for the use of slab-on-grade fioors, provided <br /> � � � the subgrade is properly prepared. Ideally, to minimize fioor settlement and associated <br /> N cracking, all existing root-laden soils, or any uncontrolled fill material should be removed <br /> and replaced with compacted structural fill. Alternatively, if the owner can accept some <br /> risk of floor slab settlement and cracking, it would be acceptable to remove anly the <br /> upper 2 feet of inedium dense fill soils and replace them with at least 2 feet of properly <br /> compacted structural fill. Regardless of which floor option is selected, the floor subgrade <br /> areas should be prepared as described in the Site Preparation section of this report, and <br /> structural fill should be placed and compacted as described in the Structurai Fill section. <br /> � � We recommend that the floor slab be underlain by a 4-inch minimum thickness of clean <br /> � �� sand and gravel, washed rock, or pea gravel to serve as a capiliary break. The capillary <br /> break material should contain at lest 40 percent (by weight) gravel-sized particles <br /> 1 �� retained by the U.S. No. 4 Sieve, and the fines content should be limited to 3 percent or <br /> ��.� less, based on the soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 4 Sieve. Also, an impervious <br /> moisture barrier should be placed between the slab and the capillary break material. <br /> ��� Based on the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in our borings, we do not <br /> I �'�� presently anticipate that an extensive below-slab drainage system would be required, <br /> provided a perimeter footing drain is installed as described in the Drainage <br /> ���) Considerations section in this report. The final decision regarding the need fo� a below <br /> slab drainage system should be made based on a field evaluation of on-site greundwater <br /> , '� seepage patterns at the time of construction. V�'e wouid be able to offer additional <br /> �� design recornmendations should such a drainage system become necessary. <br /> � <br /> .. Backfilied Walls <br /> �1� Althcugh the site plan provided us does not indicate that backfilled walls are included in <br /> the buiiding design, �ve are offering the follo�ving recommendations in the event that <br /> backfilled �valls may be required. Walls constructed to allow some defiection (on the <br /> order of G.1 percent of the wail heiqht) durino bad<fill placement may be designed to <br />