Laserfiche WebLink
�, <br /> r - <br /> . C'u/�v =- <br /> �-,;�G- <br /> �i;pis= , ._- .t.__ .�„, <br /> � <br /> � eVE'Y�t"i <br /> ��y <br /> � <br /> August 20, 1980 L`����� � <br /> , �� , � <br /> �:1� 3//d �c; . <br /> / <br /> � �U �r <br /> >�.y � ��"'� • <br /> �"- `� ,.� � <br /> Mr. John C. Bryant L �� �'/ ` ��A` / <br /> Bryant dc Frets, AIA Jr t,.: ��� � ��•���� ' "' <br /> 717 Medlcal-Dental Bulid[ng �,��,�� �� �� •�Q ,. s�� <br /> P. O. Box 9E6 ��.� �,..L <br /> Everett, WA 98206 !ti� y//� <br /> REs Site Work Plan Review for A4DE Pac•tnership Build �fIc dc Plne <br /> Dear Mr. Bryants <br /> �----- �/ <br /> it was a pleasure meeting you Monday afternoon; and a former Llghtning skipper from <br /> a huil number in the 80's. . . I am impressedl That certainly pales my senlorIty in <br /> hull number 864. Confirming our dlscussion, I have personally review-ed the comments <br /> �n your plans� and I support the professional judgment expressed by h1r. Tom Thetford <br /> as both good clvll engineering and pubiic works maintenance practice, but I mwt also <br /> agree that our trarumittal of Tom's comments on your check prints was a ltttle difficult <br /> to read in places. However� leglble r:rltten comments «�ere alao attached which may <br /> not have been brought to your atter tlon, and I have had them typed with a copy attached <br /> for your use. _ <br /> Relative to tlght Ilning the roof drains, the intent is to keep runofl from flowing acro.:,s <br /> the stdewalks whIch could cause a sli�Qing hazard when wlnter frcezing temperatures <br /> are a distinct possibllity. Dischargin_r, from the roof drelns lnto tl�- planters Is acceptable <br /> provided the planters can recelve all the runoff. D3scharging onic the paved areas <br /> is undesirable as pointed out, and my suggestlon is to delete the words, "or onto paved <br /> areas" in note number 8 on Sheet SP. <br /> Slnce the drainage calculations accompany ng yaur plans included on-site �etentlon, <br /> we assumed you werc considering tfils �n your design even though lt w•as not shown <br /> on t17e plans. To avotd any posstt!e misunderstanding, we pointed out that detention <br /> was not required, but that a gas trap w(th oil separator must be included. Thls wns � <br /> in:.luded ln the SEPA review last February which should havc been sent t�� you at that <br /> tlme. A copy cf ttie outlet trap detail from the Clty's Developers Guide and Constructlon <br /> Standards is attached. This should be incorporated into the design for Catch Dasln i <br /> No. 1 which is closest io the receiving sewer. � <br /> I agree with you that where -onstruction standards are common knowiedge, they need <br /> only be referenced on the plans whIch saves drafting time. tiowever, we have found � <br /> that often contractors do not have the CIty 5tandards let alone the APWA Standards. � <br /> Theretorc:, time and money to botli the cli.�nt and City 3s saved in the long rtm by indudIng <br /> detaiis such as the drop connection for manli�les, APWA .,candard Plan No. 43 (copy <br /> attached). As you kno�v it is not difficult to make :eproducible coples of these Stondarcls <br /> and affix them to a detail sheet. <br /> i <br /> � <br /> �I <br /> I _ I <br />