Laserfiche WebLink
�� - <br /> September 19 , 1970 <br /> The regular meeting of the City of Everett Board of Adjustment <br /> was held at 7: 30 P.M. , September 14 , 1970 in the City Hall, <br /> Council Chambers , City Hall, Everett , Washington. ; <br /> Mr. Cronin presided, h9r. Dickson, Mr. Champion , Nr. Ingram <br /> were present. Mr. Graff was absent. <br /> The reading of the minutes of the August 3, 1970 hearing were <br /> read and approved as read. <br /> A continution on the application of DSr. Ken Carpenter, 6427 <br /> Beverly Lane, requesting permission to erect and maintain an <br /> amateur radio tower to a maximum height of ninety (90) feet <br /> above ground elevation which is hi.gher than the thirty-five <br /> (35) feet maximum permitted in an R-2 Single Family High Den�ity <br /> Residence Zone, on Lot 45 , Beverly Hills , Division No. 6 <br /> (6427 Beverly Lane , �verett, V7ashington) . <br /> After hearing testimony by both the opponents and proponents � <br /> the followincj findings were made by the Board of Adjustment: <br /> 1. Although testimony was offered that a ninety (90) foot <br /> i antenna height caas desired by the apolicant, no evidence <br /> has offered that such a height caas necessary for caorld- <br /> wide Ham radio operation. ' <br /> 2. In the opinion of the neighbors , permission to grant <br /> the requested variance would have an adverse effect <br /> on the neighborhood. This is displayed by a petition <br /> containing the names of thirty-five ( 35) residents ' � <br /> protesting a granting of the proposed variance. <br /> ; <br /> 3. The Board, after visiting the site , noted the single <br /> family characteristics of the neighborhood and the '. <br /> absence of nearby similar objects or even large trees � <br /> that an antenna could be blended into. <br /> A notion was thereby made by Mr. Dickson, seconded by b1r. Ingram <br /> and unanimously carried, to deny the �aoplication on the basis <br /> that: <br /> 1. The proposed antenna cvould be incompatible in the neigh- <br /> borhood. <br /> � <br /> 2. No hardship was indicated by the applicant. , <br /> I <br /> A hearing was held on the application of Bonnie N. Peterson, . <br /> 1731 Oakes , for a variance from Section 15 .04 .090 , E.C.C. (Zoning <br /> Ordinance) R-2 , Sinale Family High Density Resid_nce Zone to <br /> � wave the minimum required side yard set-back of ten (10) feet <br /> to eiqht and one half ( 8-1/2) feet on the followinq described <br /> property: I <br />