Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ii <br /> r i II <br /> ' i . <br /> . ' i <br /> 'To File <br /> FPOM <br /> Ron Cameron, Traffic Engineer � <br /> enTe July 21� 1980 <br /> 1908 Pacific Parking Variance u,� oF r:�Er+erT,�ve�aeTr y+��s+�N�T�N <br /> SUOJEGT <br /> I <br /> The attached letter and sketch shews the Bentec Developments <br /> � here are <br /> request for a garking variance �1908 Paci.fi� � <br /> two additional comments in this memo following the earlier <br /> comments to the BOA and made in response to Marc Bhends <br /> request: <br /> 7,. The "South of Pacifiroblemshasrvariousssina <br /> history of parking p <br /> gle family buildings have bresidencesteeto <br /> offices, multiple dwelling <br /> � The result has been a suacesncomP undedlby <br /> in total area parkiny sP <br /> the CBD growth across Pacific. Parking has <br /> been restricted to permits for residences <br /> only following public hearings, community <br /> involvement, etc. <br /> There is no possible exception for parking <br /> requirements in this neighborhood. Any <br /> variance approved by the City would '�� ednby <br /> tradictor}� to policy and action develop <br /> the Mayor and Council with tihe Therebshould <br /> through the past three years. <br /> be NO parking variances approved in this � <br /> neighborhood. <br /> 2, The drawing showing 45 degree �aith four <br /> angle stalls and a fifth stall °uidelinessle <br /> is not in conflict with design g <br /> published in the Traffi�1es41n=tlis—g�H�ly <br /> bo__k and PTrkin4 Princ�D— <br /> equal to the aisle width minimum of 20 feet, <br /> and stall �vidth minimum ot 17 . 5 feet. <br /> Minimum width 90 deg�ee parking is some-� <br /> times squeezed to 401cee�rorosalhshould3not <br /> minimum. The 90 deg ' p P <br /> be approved . <br />