Laserfiche WebLink
1 ' I <br /> 1 <br /> ' 1B ' <br /> Januazy 22, 1975 i <br /> . �� the City o: Everett, and repealing Ordinanee No. 132-71, Evere.t Ci.ty Code , <br /> 2.16.010 ihrough 2.16.230, and Ordinance 3880, Everett City Code 2.18.010 <br /> through 2.18.260. ' . <br /> � ----- � C;oved by Councilr.�an Aldcroft, seconded by Councilman Gipson to amend Coun- <br /> �� cil sil!. No. 374-7A as £ollows: . - <br /> aevisions to Sec. 7: � <br /> Right of Entry , - <br /> Whenevez necessary to make an inspection to en£orce the Ci.y's codes � <br /> regulating :he coas:Lvc:ion, naintenance and repair oE buildings and <br /> . their appurtenances such zs the Huiluing Coce, ftous�r.g Coce, C�oSe:ous �..-,�� <br /> Eu:lding Ozdinance, Electrical Code and Fire Codc, or whenzver tnere is <br /> � reasonable ce.ase to believe there exists a violatioa o� such orcinznce �.� <br /> or codes, the Fire Ciie.`, Suilding Of:icial or t5eir aut:�or:zei. re�ze- � /' <br /> � - sentatives may, upon presenta:ion oE :heir proper crez�ntials, enter such / ( <br /> � � buildings or premises to inspec_ the same or to per£orm any duty `_npose� . � <br /> upon h:n by ordinance only a.`ter £orty-eight hours o: advance notice has i .: <br /> been given by Cex:ified N.ail �:ith requested return zeceipt out;ir.:a4 , ; <br /> reasons and the time fnr inspect:ion and' statina �hat the prope:ty ou:r.e= i f <br /> nas the :ight to re_use entry subjecc to review by a court of caapeteat ; 1 .; <br /> jurisdiction, provifled, no�revex, this section shall no: be applicable ����, <br /> � :o energency sitcations znBangering t:e persons o£ pro�erty, ar.d p:o- <br /> vided .`-arther thzt t�e forty-eight hour advance notice may, in :he c�sere- I,.C: <br /> � tion o: the appro?rizte iaspectinq of�icer, be dispensed with in th� � <br /> inspection of buil2ings .in whicn the genera: public is invi:ed, or in the � ?} <br /> inspection o£ buildings or structures under construction, regair, altera- , <br /> tion or removal or in the inspection of any abandoned build`_ag. ,� � <br /> In the event the owrer and/or occupant refus�s en:xy after sucti request �` <br /> has been ma8e, the official is hereby empowered Lo :.eek .he assistar.ce 14 <br /> � ' from any court of competent jurisdiction upon notice to said oomer and _ �h <br /> occupaat. p <br /> Section 9r Paiagraph 4 to.tead ae fol}ows: . . ; <br /> "Every permit issued by the Building Official under thc provisioac o: � <br /> '.his Code shall excire bg limitation anfl become null and void, i: the <br /> building or work authorized by such pemit is not comnenced within ;20 � <br /> � days fror date of...." � , � <br /> ; <br /> And the ineertion of Section 18 which reada as follows: <br /> The IIuilding Official or zny employee charged with the enforcement of `his <br /> Code, acting in good faith and without malice :or :he jv:isdiction in . <br /> discharge of his 3uties, shall not thereby render himself liable perso:.- � <br /> ally and he hereby is ralieved from all nersonal lia5ility for any daa.ace <br /> � that may accrue to ?ersons or property as a zesult of any act required or <br /> - by reason oF any act or omission in the dischaxge of his du:ies. Any suit <br /> brough: against the Buildinq O:ficial or employees, because o� such act <br /> or onission per:ormed by him in ttie enforoement o: aay provisions of this <br /> Code, shall be defended by the legal department of the juris3iction until <br /> final termination of the proceedings. . <br /> Roll was called on tlie amendment with all Councilmen voting yes except � <br /> Councilman Langus who abstained. ' . <br /> AmendmenY Carried <br /> t;oved Sy Councilman Gipson, seconded by Councilman N.ichelson that this is <br /> declared to be the :inal rcadir.g of Council Bill No. 374-74 and the City <br /> Cl.er'r. i� �ircct��� to call thc roll for the Einaldisposltion of the ordi- <br /> nance as a;,enCeQ. � <br />