2832 MEDORA WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import

..F:hr,iar;' 2 , L�7 i The regular rneetinc of t::c City of Everett .uo�rd of: Aljust:aent as held at 7: 30 p.m. , Feuruary 2, 1970, in the City Fdnll Council Chambers, Cily t{all, Gverett, Washinqton. :dr. Graf� presided, Hr. Ingram, Fir. Cronin, and !fr. 17iG:son were pre:�ent. t�s. Cliampion wa3 abaent. 'Phe minutss of the January 5, 1970 Board of Adjuatm�nt �feeting �acrc rcad and a��proved as r.ead. n continuation on the application o£ Doctor �a. T. Pia3lcr, 1021 I:d- :oozde Avenue, for a variance fr�m Lhe ordinance and pemission to utilize a lot iiith an averaqe wic9th of fifty•-five (55) feet in an Ft-1, Single Family Laa Density re,idence zone. (3706 Fri�.la;+. ) ^.here way no add.itional tenti�{ony fror� vr, i;asler. nfeer 1�ersonally visiting Clie subject propert�, nn.l ��valuatin�; the surveryor's chanqc in rub-divillnq to allo:a nor.e sc.Iuare footage in lot eaidtti on Pnrcel "A" and "H" of Lots 9 nnd 10 , Bloe}; �, Priday'a second ,^dciition, the board found that the prot43tid vari- ance ic consistent �riti� the eaistiri<� properties of the arr_a, it rras moved Ly tir. Ingram, seconded by �ir, DicY.^on, an3 unani- mously carried to grant tl�e variance for the following reasons : 1. The autl�orization of a variance would not be dotrinental to tt�e neighborhood, ar.d the lot size:� are cansistant with t2ie adjacent lot ai.2e; in tie arca. z• ry the recent ravision of lot width Uy Dr. Ilasler's surveyor, a request for a variance i� o` a mini-�a1 naturQ and the lot sizce will he con�sistent witii ctty requirements. A continuation an the application of 1�r. RoUert Lowe, 2330 i!eJora Avenue, for a variance from thQ ordinance and pernis::ion to buiL:: to within sixteen (16) feet of thc front prorerty linc an�� to within ten (10) feet of the rcar property linc �n Lot: 2G, ;:t. �a'ccr Viow addition. (232 �:edora nvenue.) 1lfter pereonally visiting the subject propertr• anci cr„n�;i:i-:rin�; all tl�e evidance` and tn_3timony pressented, it �va3 r.�ovQd ��.� ';r. i?id:,nn , seconded Uy .1r. Ingra�a, and unenimously carric�l to qrant the applicant's reque3t for Uie follo:,rin9 reasons: 1. Sx the granting of. t'�e v�riaitce thero will Lc no adverse effect on the surroundinq propertic� . Z. Tlie unu�ual lot location and desi�-;n of tl,c su;,jcct Property proJ�ibits �etter utili�.,�ion of tl�r ;ui>�;,��L ]ot for rc:3iQential nun?or,�•� .