Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> i <br /> I .- . I <br /> i <br /> the Southerly margin of said E1 Capitan Way; thence North ' <br /> 89°49' + <br /> East along said Southerly margin for 430. 7g f.eet � ; <br /> to the true point of beginninq, (9p21 Eastmont Shopping <br /> Plaza - vacated pharmacy. ) <br /> After visually viewinq the subject property and considerir,g all the � <br /> testimony and evidence presented, it was moved by Mr, Champion seconded <br /> bY Mr• Cronin and unanimously carried to rieny the applicants re � <br /> for the following reasons : <br /> quest i <br /> 1• This is a B-1, Neighborhood Shoppznq Zone where signs are f <br /> restricted in size primarily �ecasse of the proximity : <br /> of residential homes. � <br /> Z• The applicant should have been aware of zoning restrirtions � <br /> prior to renting the building. ,yo har�;hlp exists that could <br /> not have been avoided. ( <br /> 3• No testimony was offered by the appiicant to indicate a � <br /> hardship other than he wanted the sign to be visible from <br /> the freeway. + <br /> 4. The Board canr.,ot justify a sign wit}� such an extreme change <br /> from 30 sq, ft. (maximum size as apecified by City Ordinance) <br /> to 160 sq, ft. in size. <br /> A hearing was held on the application of Kenneth C. <br /> Beverly Lane, Everett, Washington, for a var.iance fromrSection 15.04. 09p r <br /> Everett City Code (Zonin � 64z� ' <br /> to a maximum height of nin�tdinance) to erect an amateur � � <br /> higher than the thirty-five Y �90� feet above radio tower <br /> (35) feet maximum permiatedeintannRW2ich is <br /> Single Family l�igh Density Residence Zone, on Lot 45 , Beverl <br /> Division No. 6 (6427 Beverly Lane, Evcrett, Washington) . � <br /> Y Hills , <br /> There was some objection from the audience on Mr. Carpenter's r.e u st. I <br /> Some of thc neighbors objected to the asthetic value + <br /> with this magnitude (y0 ' of an aerial � � <br /> ) of radio and TV interf.erence. <br /> After vi.sually viewing the subject property and considerin <br /> evidence and testirnony presented, it was moved b <br /> bY Mr• Cham��ion g al� the <br /> of a decisi�n on thisuaanlmously carried to Y j�r• Crcnin, seconded <br /> September 19 , 197p Pub1Pc11learinn for furiher�sipane thc rendering <br /> g of the Board of Adjustmente <br /> The motion was Tade, seconded, and unanimously carried to <br /> $oard ef Adjustment hearing September 19 , 1970 because <br /> scheduled hearin have ihe next <br /> g falls on a holiday, t»� regularly <br /> On motion, the meeting adjourned at 8 :3G p,m. , August 3, 1970 . <br /> r. N• BL•'NNTTT, Secr�tary <br /> Board of Adjustment <br /> 21/10 & 23/1 <br />