Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> 3. 7'hc impact of h-affic };encr:itcd b�' �hc proposed usc un thc surroundin}; arca, pcdestrian <br /> circulation and public safetl; aud thc ability of thc proponent to mitigatc such potcntial <br /> impacts. <br /> finding: No pcople will work at the site cxcept lor installation and periodic maintenancc. <br /> Conclusion: Therc will be no adverse lraffic impacts generated by Uic proposal. <br /> 4. The provision of adequatc off-street parkin�, on-site circulation, and site access. <br /> P'inding: �xisting off-strcet parking is available. No additional parking stalls are needed. <br /> Conclusion: Additional off-slreet parkiug spaces are not required. <br /> 5. Compatibility of proposed structures and improvements with surrounding properties, <br /> including the size, height, location, setback and arrangement of all proposed buildings and <br /> facilities, especially as they rel�te to light and sliadow impacts on more sensitivc land uses <br /> and Iess intensive zones. <br /> rinding: The project will include placing a power radio equipment cabinent near thc Uase of the <br /> monopole. The antennas will be mounted at a height of 90 feeL There �vill no lighl or shado�+� <br /> impacts. <br /> Conclusion: The proposal is compatible with surrounding uses. <br /> 6. The number, size and locntion of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive land <br /> uses. <br /> Finding: Sign Category C applies. <br /> Conclusion: No signs are proposed. <br /> 7. The landscapiug, buffering and screening of buildings, parking, loading and slorage areas, <br /> especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. <br /> Finding: The site has bcen landscaped under 5PU#00-018. <br /> Conclusion: The site is adequatcly UuCfered from thc public rights-of-way and ncighUoring <br /> properties. <br /> 8. The gencr:ition of nuisance irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blight <br /> or othcr undesirablc imp�cts. <br /> ✓� <br />