6400 MERRILL CREEK PKY 2018-01-01 MF Import

I ` EPA LISTS • NPL dated June 18, 1993. lbis list includes sites that have been officially designatal as ( priority c:eanup sites. • CERCLIS list dated December 9, 1993. This list includes sites where hazazdous substances ( are lmown or sa,peded to have been releasad and where assessment and remediation under � EPA's CERCLA program may be in progress. � • RCRA Nodfiers list datod November ]0, 1993. '1Lis list identifies facilides that aze classified by the EPA as hazardous waste generators, transporters or handlers. TLe appearance of a facility on this list does mt imply that a release or spill of hazudoua ( material has occurred at the facility. • ERNS lists dated October 1990 through June 1993. 'ihe ERNs database contains a li�ting of releases of oil and other hazardoac substances to various federal agencies since January � 1987 and is updated daily. � ECOLOGY LISTS • Confirmed and Suspected Contaminatad Sites Report dated October 13, 1993. 17iis list f indicates the affected medis, contaminaets and type of�elease for each site in Ecology's ! database of sites known or suspocted to be contaminated. I • MTCA Site Register dated January 4 through August 17, 1993. 'Ihis periodical lists sites for which Ecology has recendy reviewed repo�ts, or where public comment periods or Ecology orders aze pending. � • UST list date3 Febcuary 22, 1993. Tbis list tracks permined, ac6ve and docommissioned USTs registered with Ecology. Heating oil USTs are eacempt from UST registration and S typically do not appear on this list. • LUST list dated April 20, 1993. 'lt�is list records LUST sites reported to Ecology's � regional affices. Only LUST events reported after January 1989 aze included on this list. LANDFILL REGISTERS 1 We reviewed the "Solid Waste Sites of Record" list dated October 22, 1991, published by the Sno6omish Health Disuict. No active or abandoned landfilis were listed within a 1/1-mile fradius of the site. 1_ CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDA.TIONS ( GENERAL We conciude that geotechnical and geoenvironmental conditions aze favorable for { development of the site az proposed. Based on the resulcs of our subsurface exploration aod � analyses, we recommend that the proposed building be supported on conventional shallow � foundations bearing on undisturbed, medium dense to very dense native till or propaly compacted structural fill. ( G e o fi n Q i n e e r c 6 Fk No.32l6-0Q2-A01l02N94