My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2518 MONROE AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
MONROE AVE
>
2518
>
2518 MONROE AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2022 3:34:59 PM
Creation date
2/26/2017 12:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
MONROE AVE
Street Number
2518
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 03 1985 <br />BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ...... . ..................................................... <br />FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER CITY OF EVERETT <br />(Variance G12-85) Puh'ic Works Dec;. <br />July 2, 1985 <br />Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning <br />code, specifically 19.16.050(B), made by George Garvell at 2518 Monroe Avenue, <br />hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", the Board of Adjustment, following a <br />public hearing on said application held on July, 1 1985, 1985, and further <br />having reviewed all testimony, makes the following Findings, Conclusions, and <br />Order: <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br />1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or <br />conditions applying to the subject property or as to the intended use <br />thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same <br />vicinity or zone. <br />Finding: The lot is 62 feet 6 inches x 115 feet. The existing garage <br />sets one foot from the side property line. The applicant is proposing <br />to rebuild at the same location. If allowed to rebuild, it would <br />require that the applicant be on adjacent property for construction. <br />Conclusion: Staff has not supported side setback requirements less <br />than three feet unless the applicant has an easement from adjacent <br />property. <br />2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of <br />other properties in the same vicinity or zone. <br />Finding: Most accessory buildings that are in the older platted areas <br />of Everett don't maintain sideyard setbacks, however, they are adjacent <br />to other accessory buildings and take access off of alleys. <br />Conclusion_: This accessory structure is not consistent with other <br />structures in older platted areas which take access off of alleys. <br />3. That the authorization of such variance will not be materially <br />detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the <br />vicinity or zone in which the property is located. <br />Finding: The existing structure sets next to a principal structure on <br />the adjacent property. There is adequate area for a new structure to <br />be placed on the lot. <br />Conclusion: Side yard setback should be maintained from principal <br />structure at a minimum of at least three feet. <br />1164F <br />z <br />0 <br />m <br />0 <br />-1 <br />m <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.