5114 NARBECK AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

.-� C. Grosa Floor Area Ratio: � 1. Findinga: Other lota in thie vicinity are much larger and so : can have larger homes without exceeding the groea floor area ' ratio, and the Board hae granted other variancea for groes ' floor area ratio. 2. Conclueion: Granting the variance would allow a property right , enjoyed by others in the vicinity and zone. D. Height: �, I ].. Findinga: The Board has granted variances for height in the R—S zone and the code ia being changed to allow a 28 foot height. 2. Conclueion: Granti¢g the variance would allow a property right �i enjoyed by othere. , Criterion No. 3: That the authorization of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public Welfare or injurioue � to property in the vicinity or zone in which the property ie located. A. Front Yarda B. Rear Yard I�i, C. Grose Floor Area Ratio D. Height 1. Finding: There have been no adveree commenta received on thie I propoeal and it doea not appear that any of the variances would I obatruct any of the currently platted lota vieKa and at thie � time it ie difficult to determine if there will be view i blockage for future development. ! 2. Concluaion: It does not appear that any of the variancee i requeeted would be detrimental to the public welfare or � injurious to othera in the vicinity or zone with the ezception � of the front yard setback, the front yard setback variance � r_ould reault in noise impacts on future residente of the ; , propoeed aingle family home. 'i Criterion No. 4: That [he grauting of such variance will not adversely affect the Compreheneive General Plan. ' A. Front Yard Requirements 1. Findings: The Comprehensive Plan designation is single family residential; however, the Comprehenaive Plan deaignates Narbeck as a potential arterial street. 2. Concluaion: A variance for front yard aetback could result in - a future residence having only a 15—foot setback from an , ar!erial atreet carrying up to 5,000 tripa per day. � �