Laserfiche WebLink
(6) I feel Lhat enforcin4 the rear setback uf 25 Yeet would <br />be unfair in two waYs. The houae was 3esi3•^•ed cn the uasis <br />nf inr_�+-rect info:mation that I relied on because it came from tlte <br />orePer =uthority. Also as previouslY m�nticne3, tiie onl'1 reasonable <br />orientaion oF a house on lor 9 is to hav4 the north �ide as the <br />front and this is ha.o the huuse on L�t 3 has ueen consuvcted. <br />With existin4 setbacks bein4 met what actually happens is that <br />50 feat is beiny reyuired as a side Yard between two houses instead <br />o£ the benafit of 15' wnich all other PCOpBCC� owners have. <br />(the house on lot � is 25 feet from my west border) <br />(�) I can fors�e no raasonable wa; that granting this <br />var�.ance would be in anv wa7 har�iful to anv other �roperty owner. <br />rir. Bigelow (owner of lnc 8) has expr>>sed hi� int�nt cf 5rant the <br />necessary ea�ement (si4ned scatemsnt includs3). Hs has indicated <br />it o-rould actuallY be 3 benefit to him to have constructior� and <br />mainteriance costs s'harel on ttle lon3 �irive approacti to his l��t. <br />'Che homes rresentlY located to `he south and e+ast u.-" lot 9 are <br />situated in densa_ wo��ds and the placem.nt of my home has no <br />affect an the,n aC all. The wuo3� ar�a s� �i�nse that i really can't <br />ever. see their homes. <br />�g) Ny variancs rec�uest in no waY aEfects th^ comcrehensive <br />general pla because it is zcned for �inele family residence <br />and I am complving with th3t. <br />RlCK RCDERTCK <br />�'� , f <br />�� <br />���c� �\Ci'�J�'�.:..- <br />614 Washin�7ton Court� <br />hlukilteo, W�shin3ton <br />98275 <br />3�8-5860 <br />