Laserfiche WebLink
I. Geotechnical Engineering Report <br />Kvemmo Single-Family Residence <br />� 4003 Nassau Place, Evereit <br />September 17, 2002 <br />NGA File No. 35610? <br />' Page 5 <br />to hard silt at the project site best fits the UBC description for Soil Profile Type Sp (Stiff Soil Profile) for <br />1 native coils. <br />� Geotechnical seismic considerations include liquefaction potentisl and amplification of ground motions <br />by soft soil deposits. Liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand beneath the ground water table. The <br />� very stiffto hard soils interpreted to underlie the site are considered to have low potential for liquefaction <br />or amplification of ground motion. <br />Erosion Hazard <br />The criteria used for evaluation of erosion harards include soil type, slope grsdient, vegetation cover, and <br />Igound water conditions. The surface soil types (group classification) are related to the underlying <br />geologic soil units. The Soil Survev of Snohomish Countv Area. Washin on, by the Soil Conservation <br />�_ Service (SCS), wu reviewed to evaluete the erosion hazard of the on-site soils. <br />� The surface soils at the site were mapped by the SCS and classified as Alderwood gravelly sendy loam. <br />'fhe su�cial site soils we observed are not consistent with the Alderwood gravelly sandy loam soils. T'he <br />soils expected to be exposed during site development consist of loose silry fill material. The erosion <br />potential of these fill soilt should be considercd moderate to high. <br />The contact between +.i;e existing fill and the native soils is a potential slip surface. Recommendations for <br />improving the stability of the fill material can be found in the Slope Stability subsection of this repott. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />General <br />It is our opinion that the existing loose fill in the planned addition area is not suitable for support of a <br />shallow foundation due to the substantial potential for future foundation settlement and cracking. Also, <br />the fill was placed in an uncontrolled manner, making future fill movement and sliding a possibility. It is <br />likely that the site was not properly suipped of topsoil material or benched prior to placing the fill. You <br />plan to place up to 8 feet of fill material as a part of the site development. In our opinion the existing fill <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.^ <br />U <br />