4010 NASSAU PL 2016-01-01 MF Import

�' II r1 "' II BOAAD OF ADJU3TM3NT FINDINf3S� CONCLQSIONS AND ORDSR (Variar,ca i2-86) February 5� 1986 Hased upon the written request for a varianea from the Cit�'s zoning code, specifically 19•14.050, made by Mr. 8 Mrs. Quarterman at 4010 Nassau Place� hereinafter referred to as "Applicant�" the Hoard of Adjustment� following a public hearing on said application held on March 3r 1986, and further having revieksd all testimony, makes the following Findings, Conclusions, and Order: 2. That thero have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property or as to the intended use thereof that do not apply generally to othar properties in the same vicinity or zone. a. Finding: The lot is a 70' x 155° end slopes to the south. The lot Ss locatnd in an R-1 zone xhich required a 20' rear yard setback. The building area would be approuimately 30' x 95'• The proposed house is 30' x �0' with a two-car garage. b. Conclusion: Given the slope of the preperty and the lot depth, tha location as proposed hy tha applicant is reasonable. Tliat sueh variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoy9ent of a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the ownere of other properties in the same vicinity or :.one. a. Findtng: A varianee xas granted on Lot i7, the adjaoent lot for the same reason. b. Conclusion: This variance is consistent xith property in the area. 3. That the authorization of sueh varian�e uill not be materially detrimental to the public rtelfare or injurious to property in the vicinity or zor.e in whieh the property is located. a. Finding: Lot #5 and #7 properties rrill not be affected. Lot /5 viev is to the northeast. Tha placement of this dwelling should improve the view of Lot #5 over that of a normal setbacl:. b. Conclusion: This varianee would not ba injurious to property in the area. 4. That the grantiug of such vai•iance aill not adversaly affeet the Comprehensive General Plan. a. Finding: The Comprehensive Plan shows this area as single fam±ly residential. b. Conclusion: The variance will not affec:t the Comprehensive Plan.