Laserfiche WebLink
Yage 2 to ApplicntLu�i for <br />Uariance by M/itiis. C�u;.rtarman <br />'1'he existing setoacks on this property limit the choices of <br />dwelling very severcl,y that we could build on this property. <br />1'his is due to thc configuration and shape of lot 6. We are <br />therefor^ asking for a vnriance to permit bui�Lding up to 5' <br />f'rom the re�: property line. <br />1, Lot G is unusually narrcx and the precent cetback for the <br />the renr �?ro�crty line of 20� would limit ttic: poe.siblc widtl� <br />of rin,y :;tructure to 30� . Thi� would be unacceptable to u:. <br />2. Lot 7;,lr�auy ha;; obtained the variance that we are requesting. <br />j. The authoriz�tion of this variance to uu is not detrimental <br />to the other property owners, but inetead would improve thu <br />eymmetry of tii� whole cul-da-sac� as it would be more in line <br />with the existi�:g buildings. The residence on lot 5 wauld <br />actually have an improv�d view� As our residence could be <br />hack further �nd would not block hi:� view. The property <br />d'.rccLly South of the rear property line (outside of Nasau <br />Vievi`Pract) preacntly has no view acrn::c 1ot 6 to the North, <br />a11 their vi�_w i�: tovrards the East. 'I'his varinnce th��refCre. <br />will not sffecC thair view in any v�ay. <br />t�. We fuel that the granting of this variance would substantially <br />enhance the gennral appearance of Nasau View Tr�.ct, by permitting <br />us to build our cesidence in a mor�: harmonious way. <br />�.:� . �.1 . _.1\ <br />-\�J�.w� �" � <br />X�-� � cJl�-� � o � �aJ�.�a7E "11 y� <br />� l � <br />� <br />