Laserfiche WebLink
LEWIS 4.BELL <br />WILLIAM F. INGRAM <br />NEWEIL SMITM <br />RICHnRO B.JOMNSON <br />EDWARD E. �CVEL <br />BELL, INGRAM, SMITH, JOHNSON Cr LEVEL <br />ATTORNEYS AT lAW <br />416 FIpST NAfIONAL DANN BUILOING <br />EVERETT� WASMINGTON 90201 <br />Mr. F. H. Bennett <br />Planning Director <br />City Hall <br />Everett, i9asli. 98201 <br />iCLFV110NC <br />LLrINE � _2'I <br />�' . � <br />June 30, 1969 � �:� r��"' ��� �' � � �� <br />RE: Cecil Farrell <br />Dear Dir. IIennett: <br />In response to your lett.er of June 27, 1�69, I wish to <br />advise that no injunctio�� has been issued in the matter. <br />ns you will note in the t}:ird paragraph of my letter, <br />the plaintiff, Mrs. Kelley, seeks a permanent injunction <br />against the building of a residence but the injunction <br />has not been issued. <br />However, by virtue of tiie nature of the case, I had no <br />alternative Uut to advise my clients tliat they should <br />not start construction on the premises until the matter <br />has been litigated in the trial set for September 30, <br />1969. <br />My �easoning was Lased on the fact that in the event <br />Mrs. ICelley should prevail and my client having had notice <br />that tt;is was the relief she sought, it is quite possible <br />the court might order destruction of the building which <br />had been constructed on the oremises during tt�e interim. <br />This, of course, would result in a waste of money to my <br />client, which they would have no way of recovering. <br />I hope this clarifies my letter and answers the questions <br />as contained in yc.�urs. <br />RICHARD II. <br />RBS:lmn <br />