Laserfiche WebLink
!.:arrin C. Ila�lund. I7irec!or h� iJtilities <br />Cioy VanDerl[eersche, �Vater Supt. F� Crai; Thompson, Sewer 9upt. <br />7-30'77 <br />SV9JiC4 [ifY F FVER�TT, EVEHcTT. 9IASryIrypTp(� <br />YROPOSED SFiORT PL.1T - POVr�LD TIIO;�IPSaN <br />�� _'1TER: <br />Tlle: e is an 8" 11C water main with approximatly 100 psi pressure to supul_{ <br />cvater to this lor.ati��n. ' ' <br />111e Utility drawing shows separate water services for both lots A and B <br />supplied 6y a comr.ioa connection. �Ve shall require that each lot be supplied by <br />separate service ccmZections. _ • � . <br />All costs associated with the relocation of the fire hydrant �vill be borne by t7ie <br />owner or developer of lot B. If the fire hydrant is to remaut__in its__gresert <br />location it might be necessary for the 1�Vater LTtility io install -.,�osts or sorre ty�e <br />of hydrant protection from vehicular traffic, this could reduce tne entrance space. <br />Tha proposed plat should not have a signuicanE impact on the �vater system. T'r.e <br />lVater Utility should have no objections to the proposal. <br />SE�i1�RS: <br />Szwers do not appear to be a problem. According to the proposal, �ve wo«ld la ve <br />to i1�;a11 a five foot side sewe: fo: lot B. This shoul3 be r.o p:oblem. <br />DR AI�IAGE: <br />Drainage is not shown on the proposed short plat and I thought that it had been <br />decided that this was going to be a requirement for s��bmitr�b short plats. In <br />tnis particular case, the aerials do not indica:e that Ehere snould be any signil`icant <br />drainage problems. I �vould still lik2 to see the esistind draiaage sysker.i on the <br />utility plans so that vre can be assured that tive don't have such problems as <br />di•ainage frorn Aiu:cilteo Boulevard discharging onCo t!ie property. <br />