My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3711 W MUKILTEO BLVD VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNA 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
3711
>
VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNA
>
3711 W MUKILTEO BLVD VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNA 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2019 7:52:02 AM
Creation date
2/26/2017 4:35:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
3711
Tenant Name
VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNA
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(I) The Planning Director may require review by an expert third <br />party. <br />22. Because the site is located in a commercial area, it will not create <br />undesirable impacts or have significant impacts on residential land uses. <br />(exhibit 1) <br />23. All supporting equipment of the proposal is to be located in the basement <br />of the existing grocery store and will not be visible. The Appiicant is also <br />proposing to paint the antennas brown in order to minimize the visual <br />impact. According to the City, these measures will minimize the visual <br />impact of the proposal. (exhibit 1, Tyler testimon}�) <br />24. Because the PUD requires a minimum separation of 15 feet from the <br />base of the antenna and the power lines, the pole must be higher than <br />the existing �0 foot high structure in order to be effective. Without the <br />variance, colacation would not be able to occur on this site, and the <br />resulting consequence would be there would be additional cell poles in <br />the area. (exhibit 1, Tyler testimony) <br />25. The facility will be removed if its use is discontinued for 120 days or <br />more. Safety lights will not be required on the facility. (exhibit 1) <br />26. In order for the pole to r-xceed the existing pole's height by an additional <br />28 feet, a variance must be secured. Pursuant to EMC 19.41.D.1.c(3), <br />the maximum height increase for a utility replacement structure is 20 <br />feet. Thus, the highest pole without a variance would be 60 feet. The <br />Applicant seeks a variance to allow the pole to be 68 feet. (exhibit 1) <br />27. In order for a variance to be granted, the criteria of EMC 19.41.130.0 <br />must be satisfied. Those criteria are: <br />(a) That the variance is necessary because of exceptional or <br />extraordinary circumstances regarding the size, shape, topography, or <br />location of the subject property; or the location of a pre-existing <br />improvement on the subject property that conformed to the Zoning Code <br />in effect when the improvement was constructed. <br />(b) That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the property <br />in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.