Laserfiche WebLink
,� l�► <br /> 2, Thar auch variance is neceasary for the preaervation and en3oyment of <br /> a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the ovners <br /> of other properties in r.he eame viciniry or zone. <br /> Finding: The applicant cculd conar.ruct an uncovered parking lor in <br /> the front yard area to within five feet of the frant property line; ; <br /> however, he wiahes to provide a covered parking epace fo'.c each unir � <br /> and in order r.o do so will need to build wtthin 12 feet o" t;�e front '• <br /> property line. There are other apartment un:r.a in rhe ite9 thar. <br /> provide covered parking. <br /> The lot width and de�th are 50 feer. by 128 feet. J: ie difficult for I <br /> Multiple Pamily Units to build on lots of thie Width and depth and <br /> provide additional ameniri�s such ae covered parking. The living <br /> areas are approaimately 800 equare feet for each unit. <br /> Historically ar.her lots r.hat have developed on 50 foot bq 128 feet <br /> lota have had a difficult time conforming to the required citq codes <br /> and provding additional amenities. <br /> Conclusion: The requested variance would allow the applicent co <br /> provide some deaireable ameniriee for the pro�ect. <br /> 3. Thar. the authorization of such variarce will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public rrelfare or in�urioue to properr.q in r.he <br /> vicinity or zone in xhich the property ia iocated. <br /> Finding: Notice of �his request wae mailed to property oxnere <br /> within 300 feet and no adverae commenre have been received . Other <br /> Citq Departmente had no adverae commente. Ther�� is a drop in r.he <br /> r.opography from r.he adjacent property to the rrest and there doee not <br /> appear rhar. extenelon of the 1ow profile of a carport would impact <br /> any views. <br /> Conclueion: Granting the. variance will not be detrimenral r.o <br /> che public welfare or injurious to property in r.he vicinity and zone. <br /> 4. That the granting of euch variance w111 not adverselq affect r.he <br /> Compreheneive General Plan. <br /> Finding: The Comprehensive Plane ehow thia area ae Multiple <br /> Family, the applicant ie providing a density that Se vir.hln rhe <br /> limir. The applicant ie also providing landecaping, screening, and <br /> open epace (court yard) between the units. <br /> Conc].usion: There would be no adverse affect on the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> RECOt4(ENDATION: <br /> APPROVE the variance as requesr.ed by applicant with r.he following condir.lon. <br /> 1. Provide a subar.anrial landecaped buffer along the west property line <br /> adjacent r.o the carporrs and along the fronr.age to coneiat of <br /> evergreen ehrube or treea a minimum of three feet high ar time of <br /> planting r.o number a minimum of aix for each 100 equare feet of <br /> planting area. <br /> Prepared by�,� � � l f ' <br /> Reviewed by ����`�'GG%���✓ � <br /> 0214f <br />