Laserfiche WebLink
NAP.RATIVE STATEMENT <br /> ' ^ � <br /> PROPOSED PROJECT: <br /> The applicant is proposing to build at some time in the future <br /> t*ao four unit apar.tments. These four unit apartments will be on <br /> i:;�dividual lots, each lot will be approximately 6,400 sq. ft. <br /> The applicant wishes to provide covered parking for each <br /> structure. In order to de this the carports must extend into the <br /> required front yard setback 8' , which would make it necessary to <br /> reduce the front yard setback to 12 ' feet from the required 20' . <br /> This would allow the applicant to provide covered parking as <br /> proposed. <br /> Each lot is being developed so that they ma,y be individually <br /> sold. <br /> A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary c�.rcumstances or <br /> conditions applying to the subject property or as to the <br /> intended use thereof, that do not apply generally to other <br /> properties in the same vicinity or zone; <br /> 1. The property frontage is on Melvin Avenue, this strenc <br /> is a dead end at Interstate 5. The proposed project <br /> would not impact this street because it is likely that <br /> it will not continue and is of an adequate width <br /> already, that being 60' right-of-way. <br /> 2. The lot width and depth are 50� by 128' . It is <br /> difYicult for Mixltiple Family Units to build on lots of <br /> this width and depth and provide additional amenities <br /> such as cover.ed parking. The living areas are <br /> approximately 800 sq. ft. for each unit. <br /> B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and <br /> enjoyment of a suhstantial property right of the appellant <br /> possessed by the owners of other properties in the same <br /> vicinity or zone; <br /> 1. The applicant could build his project without the <br /> variance. Ae could provide a parking area 5' from <br /> frotit property line, however, because he wishes to <br /> provide covered parking he must conform to setbacks of <br /> 20' for structures. <br /> 2 . Historically other lots that have developed on 50' by <br /> 128' lots have had a difficult time conforming t:o the <br /> required city codes and providing additional amenities. <br /> C. That the authorization of such variance will not be <br /> materially detrimental to the public welfare of injurious to <br /> property in the vicinity or zone in which the property is <br /> located; <br /> 1. The variance proposed wi11 not impact adjacent <br /> property, the setback requested is toward the Fublic <br /> street. The applicant intends to provide a landscaping <br /> screen adjacent to Melvin Avenue. <br /> D. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect <br /> the comprehetisive general plan. <br /> 1. The Comprehensive Plans show this ar.ea as Multiple <br /> Family, the applicant is providing a density that is <br /> within the limit. The applicant is also providing <br /> landscaping, screening, and open space (court yard) <br /> between the units. <br /> fiXIiIIIIT 3 <br /> NARRATIVE STATEMENT <br /> COR595 <br />