2511 MELVIN AVE A&B 2018-01-01 MF Import

M � Each lot ia being developed so thar. they may be individually sold. b. Conclusion: There are ezcepr.ioniil and ezrraordinary circumarancea applying to r.he aubjecr. property r.har. doee not apply to all properr.y in r.he vicinir.y and zone. Criterion A2: That euch variance is necessary f��r r.he preeervacion and enjoymenr of a subar.anr.ial property righr, of the a�pellanr. poesesaed by the oxners of or.her properties in r.he same vicinir.y or zone. a. Finding: The applicant could conatruct: an uncovered parking lor. in the front yard area r.o within fSve feet of r.he fro¢t propertq line; hoxever, he Niehes r.o provide a covered parking epace for each unir. and in order to do so will need to build within 12 feer of r.he fronr properr.y line. There are orher apartment unita in the area r.har. provide covered parking. The lor width and depth are i0 feet bq 128 feer.. Ir. ie difficulr. for Multiple Family Unite r.o bu11d on lote of rhie widr.h snd depr.h and provide additional amenir.iee auch ae covered parking. The living areae are approximately 800 square feet for each unit. Hier.orically or.her lors thar, have developed on 50 foor. bq 128 feet lor.s have had a difficulr r.ime conforning to the required ciry code9 and providing addir.ional amenir.ies. b. Conclueion: The reque�*Pd variance No�ld allow r.he applicant to provide some Lesirable ama:�iries for r.he project. Crir.erSon A3: That r.he aur.horizar.ion of euch variance will noc be mar.erially der.rimenr.al r.o r.he public welfare or in,jurioue r.o propertq in r.he vicinitq or zone in which the property ie locar.ed. a. Finding: !iotice of thie req�esr. wae mailed r.o properr.y ownere � wir.hin 300 feer. and no adveree comments have been received . Other Cit.y Departmenr.s had no adverse commenr.s. There ie e ! drop in r.,ye topography from r.he ad�acent property to *.he wesr. and there does nor. appear that exr.enelon of r.he lox profile of a carport would impacr any viexe. b. Conclusion: Granting the variance will nor. be detrimental to ' r.he public welfare or inj�rioue to property in the vicinity and zone. Crir.erion E4: That the gran� ing of auch variance will nor. adveraeiy I affecr r.he Comprehenelve General Plan. I a. P:.-,dtng: The Compreheneive Plans show thie area as Mulr.iple Famflry, r.he applicanr ie providinq a density r.har, ie within r.he limit. The applicanr. ie also providing landscaping, acreening, and open epace (courr. yard) between rhe unire. b. Conclusion: There would be no adverse affecr. on the I Compreheneive Plsn. , -2-