Laserfiche WebLink
FF Dccclopmcnt LP <br /> Octobcr 26.2011G <br /> Pagc 2 <br /> FILL MATERIAL EVALUATION AND REQUIRED COMPACTION <br /> On-silc soils ��crc uscd as fill and backfill at thc sitc. Wc cvaluatcd fill plxcmcnt xticilics ��ilhin thc <br /> Pod 2 arca �chcrc Building Nos. 8, ) and I I arc localcd during thc mass gr�ding period on 10 occasions <br /> bch�c:.n Jul�� 6, and Jul�� 27, 2005 (rcfcr to ficld report Nos. IS through 25). Wc nlso complctcd S <br /> intcmiiticnt sitc �isits bchvccn July 21, 20115 and Scp�cmbcr 2R, 2006 (rcicr to ficld report Nos. 2G — 31. <br /> 35 a�id 73)to cvaluatc compaction of thc fill placcd within �hc Pod 2 aroa. <br /> Wc c��aluatcd thc fill soil by perfortning laboratory tcsting that gcncrally wnsistcd of maximum dry <br /> dcnsih� (MDD) c��alualions per Amcrican Socicty for Tcsling and Malcrials (ASTM) D1557 tcsting <br /> proccdnrc. Thc (ill uscd �cithin thc building footprint arca, gcncrally consistcd of thc on-sitc glacial till <br /> and advancc ouhvasB soils. <br /> Wc cvaluated �hc compaclior of fill by obscrving placcmcnt proccdures, by perfomiing in-placc dcnsit}• <br /> tcsts and by probing with a 'h-inch diamctcr probc rod. Pill was gencrally compactcd to at i:ast <br /> 95 perocnt of�hc MDD in arcas bcncath Duilding Nos. 8,9 and 1 I during thc mass grading period. <br /> Bascd on our obscrvations and c�aluations, il is our opinion thal thc fill placcd �cithin thc fa,•tprint of <br /> Building Nos. S,'I mid I 1 during thc mass grading period �ccrc compactcd in gcncral acwrdancc��'ith our <br /> rr,commcndations and !hc projcct plmu and spccifications. <br /> SOIL BEARING VERIFICATION <br /> Buflding Nos. 8, 9 and!1 <br /> Wc cvaluatcd thc footing and slab subgradc soils at Duilding Nos. 8,9 and I 1 and �crificd soil bcaring on <br /> G occasions bchrccn Oclobcr 25 a�id Dcccmbcr I, 2005 (rcfcr to ficld report Nos. Sa, RG, 87,99, 1011, and <br /> 103). <br /> f3ascd on our obscn�ations, it is our opinion that soil bcaring pressurc of 2.5011 psf��as achicvcd in thc <br /> fooling subgrodc of Duilding Nos. 8,7 and I I and thc slab subgradc��as prcpazcd in gcncral aceordancc <br /> ��ith our rccommcndations and thc projcct plans and spccifications. <br /> Buildfng No. 7 <br /> Wc did not cvaluatc tl�c fooling and slab subgradc soils at Building No. 7. Duilding No. 7 is localcd cast <br /> of thc ccntral dcicmion pond and cuts��cro madc to achicvc thc dcsign building grada Wc complctcd S <br /> hand augcr holcs around Uic footprint of Duilding No. 7 on Octobcr I�I, 200G (uc auxhcd ficld report <br /> No. Id7) and cncountcrod nativc dcnsc soils at dcpths ranging Gom 0.2 to 13 fcct. Our hand holc <br /> csploralions arowid thc building suggcstcd Ihat thc fooling is likcly lo bc founded on Ihc dcnsc naticc <br /> soils. Wc did not obscrvc thc slab subgradc soils for Building No. 7 but it is our undcrslanding lliat slab <br /> subgradc soils�ccrc properly coropacicd using thc similar proccdurc uscd far olhcr buildings at thc sitc. <br /> E3ascd on our obscnalions, it is our opiuion th�1 soil bcaring pressurc of 2,500 psf was achicvcd in thc <br /> I'ooting subgrodc of Building No. 7. <br /> 2�3 <br /> l�il..Cc. '6?0.!/04.(/3 <br /> GEOENGINEERS� <br />