My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1920 MERRILL CREEK PKY 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
MERRILL CREEK PKY
>
1920
>
1920 MERRILL CREEK PKY 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2018 1:32:55 PM
Creation date
2/26/2017 7:34:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
MERRILL CREEK PKY
Street Number
1920
Notes
& 1930
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> I SHANNON&WILSON.INC. <br /> 8.2.4 i�dslide Dep�its and Fill <br /> IWithout subsurface information, it is assumed that the slope fill is non-engineeretl <br /> and loose. This is also suggested by other documents indicating end-dumped fill on the site. <br /> i <br /> I Cumently, the existing fill slopes are t1►ought to be muginally stable. This is <br /> supported by the follawing observations: 1) these soils are in a loose state, 2) fill soils W <br /> the south of the site have failed on slopes as steep as or flatter than portions of the site, 3) <br /> there is evidence of a possible scarp along the slope, as shown on Figure 1, 4) 1.SH:1V to <br /> 1.75H:1V are near the angle of repose of dumped fill, 5) stumps and debris were observed <br /> Iin the 811, 6) there is evidence of creep within the fill, and � 1Yiad Associates indicates <br /> mwements of old survey stalaes on the slope. <br /> IThe likely mode of failure with fill is also a planar, shailaw slide, which would tend <br /> I w occur during heavy tainfall or during a seismic event. As in colluvium, failure would not <br /> likely impact the proposed upslope development, but it could impact the property belaw. <br /> I 8.3 �D�C ta ion <br /> ISince the propo�ed buildings will be constructed on undisturbed, native, glacial soils, it is <br /> our opinion that the minimum 25-foot setback distance from the top of the slope (as required <br /> by EMC 19-8'n may be used in finalizing the development. These minimal setback <br /> distances will cornespond to a stability factor of safety of at least 2, pravided the <br /> Irecommendations below aze implemented. <br /> ► Although the 611 can stand vertically and suffer only a slow retreat wer dme <br /> because of its inherent erosional resistance, its slopes should be cut back to at <br /> � least 1H:1V w reduce the possibility of block falls. Addidonally, although highly <br /> resistant W erosion, the slope should be vegetated to reduce sediment dischazge <br /> Idownslope, by means established by the project landscape az�chitect. <br /> ► T'he outwash slopes should be cut back no steeper than 1.SH:IV. Vegetation or <br /> erosion-control geosynthetics will be required to control erosion. The project <br /> landscape architect should be consulted in this regard. <br /> IAdhecence to these slopes will require regrading the steep hillside areas shown on Figuce 2 <br /> to a flatter slope. The areas indicated for regrading on Figure 2 exclude a 5- to 10-faot-high <br /> I W-6693-01 <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.