My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1920 MERRILL CREEK PKY 2018-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
MERRILL CREEK PKY
>
1920
>
1920 MERRILL CREEK PKY 2018-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2018 1:32:55 PM
Creation date
2/26/2017 7:34:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
MERRILL CREEK PKY
Street Number
1920
Notes
& 1930
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I SHANNON�WILSON.INC. <br /> disposed of off-site or stocl�iled for landscape amas and only the native glacial soils used <br /> � for fill. In addition, if outwash is encountered during excavafion it should be stored for use <br /> in wet weather ceriods or in the event the till-like soils are too wet to be compacted. <br /> � As mentioned above, even the glacial, till-like soils may be difficult to work with <br /> because of the high moisture content. If such a condition exists, depending on the weather <br /> 1 during grading and schedule, the use of admixtures may be beneficial. We estimate that <br /> I treatment with lime would inv�olve the addi6on of 2 to 6 percent of lime to the wet soil (by <br /> weight). Lime wouid absorb excess moisture, reduce plasdcity, and improve worlmbility of <br /> the wet soil. It wvuld be cheaper than cement stabili7ation but would not be effecflve during <br /> 1 wet weather. Lime stabiliration was used in the recently completed Washington Natural Gas <br /> facility, near the proposed project site. The cost for soil-lime stabilizadon ranged from <br /> 51.50 to $2.50 per cubic yard (cy), as compared to the export of on-site soils and import of <br /> � clean, pit-run sand and gravel at $18/cy. We esGmate that cement stabilization would <br /> Iinv�olve the addi6on of 2 w 4 percent of cement to the wet soil (by weight). Cement also <br /> would absorb excess moisture, improve worlcability, and increase the strength of the wet <br /> I soil. T'he increase in strength could lead to reducing base coarse thicknesses for parldng and <br /> drive areas and thus reduce project costs. Cement stabili7ation is effective during wet <br /> weathec For planning purposes only, the costs of stabilizing sc�il with cement could be on <br /> � the order of$6 to $7/cy. <br /> If the� is not enough suitable on-site material available for the necessary fill <br /> application, imported structural 811 matcrial will be required. Imported structucal fill should <br /> I consist of mzsonably well-gradei sand or sand and gravel, free of otganics and other <br /> deleterious materials, with a maaimum particle size of 3 inches. It should contain not moce <br /> I than 30 pem.ent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve), by wcight, based on wet-sieving <br /> the soils frdction passing the 3/4-inch sieve. Imported sWctural fill should be at a moistu�e <br /> content near the optimum value to allaw proper compacdon. <br /> � <br /> In wet weather or under wet condidons, it wili be necessary to impert an all-weather <br /> ISll material for use as structural fill or try mixing addidves to the soil, as discussed <br /> previously. An all-weather flll should consist of masonably w�ll-graded sand or sand and <br /> � gravel, free of organics and other deleterious materials, with a maximum particle size of 3 <br /> inches. It should contain not mo�e than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve), <br /> I <br /> � W-6693-01 <br /> 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.