19 E MARILYN AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� r-- �� � BOARD OP ADJUSTMENT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND OPDER � (Variance �32-84) i� IIBased upon the wri[ten request for a variance from the City's zoning IIcode, epecificnlly 18.44.210, made by Donald Lachapelle_ � et 19 Martlyn Ave. , hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," the Baard oF iAdjustment, following a public t�earing on said application held on Nov. S , � � i 1984, and further having reviewed all testimony, makea the following Findinge, � �� Co.:cluaione, and Order: I F?NDIIlGS AND CONCLUSIONS: I� 1. There are exceptianal or extraordinary circumstancea or conditione ' applying to the subject property which do not apply generally to other � � properties in :he same vicinity or zone. II Finding: The applicant owne a parcel of property vhich ie located at 19 Marilyn Ave. The applicant's property consista of a 280 foot x 100 foot lot with a eingle family residence on proposed lot 1. On lot /3, orientation of the building site is north and south, but the lot orlentation is eaet and weat. �oncluaion: The uppl!�ant's property does have adequate area for 3 eingle family lots. On lot 93, building orientation ehould be north and south so as to be consiatent with other single family homes in the area. � I 2. The authorization of the variance will not be detrimental to the public velfare or injurioue to the property in the same vicinity or zone. Finding: The applicant is proposing one accesa, point onto Marilyn Ave. in vliic�c ��'�-iat:.--�a:':,�;a��,�,mq�nn drive. The common drive wouldl ' have less impervious eurface and would not require maintenance by [he� City. Conclueion: The proposed easement drive will be 20 feet and will eerve all lota. 3. There are no reasonable alternatives which would allow for acceptable� design of the short subdivieion in accordance with exiating etandards. Finding: Exiating City etanda:de would require a 40 foo[ right-of-vayl and 24 feet of pavement. Cancluaion: Easement access ib a reasonable aiternetive to atreeta in thia location. • 4. The applicant's request for a ehort subdivieion has been proceased by the City which confirme that the final approval cannot be granted without an authorized varia[ion from the Board. Finding: The applican[ has filed a ahort subdivieion wi:h the City. IConclusion: This short au'�division is under review. � I �� 0997G � I I � �� � i I � � I - �I II