Laserfiche WebLink
Ma�+ch 12, I993 <br /> MWIs Soil Data Validation Review �' <br /> Page 2 <br /> Barium and chromium wero detected in the samples; thu results wera flagged J. Gdmium, lead, and silver were .-, <br /> not detec4�d in the samples; the detection limits wero Flagged UJ. Zinc was detected ia the samples, however daG <br /> qualification wu not required as the original cemple rinc concentration was greater than 4 times the spike <br /> concentntion. <br /> 5. Repocted Detxtion Limits-Acceptable <br /> 6. Type of Data Vdidation Review -Summary ,�, <br /> 7. Ovecall Aasmsmeat of Data <br /> 1Le usefulnms of tLe dah is basad on the fiPA guidance docummta listed rbova. Upon cousidention of <br /> t6e information praemted above, the dau aro aoceptable e�ccept whero flrgged with dafa qwlifiers thu modify the <br /> usefulness of the individual values. <br /> Data Oualifiers li <br /> U - 1Le material was analyzed for,but was not detected above the level of the associated value. T6e associatal ' <br /> value is ather the sample quautitation limit or the sample detection limit. <br /> J- 'Ihe�ssociated numerical value is an estimated quautity. , . <br /> UJ - The m�teriel was analyzed for, but was no[ detected. The associeted value is an estimate and may be <br /> inaccunte or imprecise. <br /> R- 'Ihe data are uousable. (Note: Analyte may or may not be preseat.) <br /> � iF2q.ME1' <br /> ; <br />