Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> Cl <br /> r <br /> I <br /> i <br />� <br /> I <br /> II ' D. That the granting of such variance will not adversely <br /> � affect the comprehensive general plan. <br /> ` � A hearing was held on the application of Gary Rhoden, 2314 129th <br /> Place Southeast, Everett, Washington, from Section 15. 04. 090 <br /> E.C.C. (Zoning Code) R-2 Single-Family High-Density Residence ' <br /> Zone Subsection E, Yard Requirements to locate his residence to <br /> within twelve (12) feet of the front property line and be in keeping <br /> with the homes of the adjacent properties. <br /> � The present zoning ordinance requires a twenty (20) fo�t front <br /> ; yard setback. <br /> � Legal Description: Lots 3 and 4 Block 503 <br /> ! Miley Land Company's Third Addition to Everett <br /> i 2325 Maple <br /> � After reviewing the subject prooerty and considering all the facts <br /> it was moved by Mr. Baird, seconded by Mr. Berg and unanimously <br /> carried to grant the applicant' s request for the following reasons. <br /> � A. There are e:cceptional or extraordinary circumstances <br /> j or conditions applying to the subiect oroperty or as to <br /> ! i the intended use thereof, that do not apply generally to <br /> � other properties in the same vicinity or zone, speci- <br /> fically: <br /> I r { 1. The dwelling is located on a block where all <br /> i � r � � but one of the existinq homes do not meet the <br /> i I � 20 foot setback. <br /> B. That the variance is necessary for the preservation <br /> i and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the <br /> � appellant possessed by the owners of other properties <br />' � in the same vicinity or zone . specifically: <br /> 1. The applicant' s dwelling would be essentially <br /> 1 aligned with the dwelling to the north and set- <br /> �' *F back further than the house to the south. <br /> �` �''� 2. The average setbac}: for all houses on this <br /> ; .ro, .' 1 block is 14. 5 feet. <br /> `�, ! C. That the authorization of such varisnce will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public �velfare or injurious to property <br /> in the vicinity or �one in which the property is located; <br />' specifically, for the reasons givcn above. <br /> D. That the granting of such variance will not adversely <br /> __ affect the comprehensive general plan. <br /> On motion, the meeting adjourned at 8 : 05 p.m. <br />� ���,� <br /> Reid H. Shockey, Secretary <br /> M ' Board of Adjustment <br /> k <br /> F <br /> i <br />