901 MAPLE ST 2018-01-02 MF Import

. . ..�,' �`. ". . .. . nr,r,�.c .,�row� or nrrr,r.cn►a�r ; ., . . . . POI11T 1. Thc iol.lo:•�iny ar.c Ll�e s��eci.al circtim�tances �•�hicl� apply tomy prope�:ty a�hi.ch deprS.ve me of riy;�L•s ancl privilcycs �•�hicl; are. ' • enjoyed by other pr.opextie:. i.n L•]ie vicinity under ihe zdentical zone classii•ication. • . . ' ^Mv propertv is onlv one hundred sauare feet s ort of the_7500 square fnot re- � quirement. � � POI17i 2. The variance 2 am requesting will not be detrimental to � tr,e public welfare or injurious to L-he properties or improveme�its � i.n the vicinity of a zone in i•rhich my property is iocated because: jh�e ar�,d�ol��s on Maole Street and Waln � . S -r Pt with;n twn •hlnckc. (;rand Viaw Homes (multi-plex units) are in a 300 foot radius of my lot. My duplex will be of a ,� � quality consistent with, or better than, other dwellings in the vicinity. FDI;�T 3. :1:f this variance is. not gran{:ed, an unner..�>ssary hardship a�:ll continue t-o ti�� oarner of this property, the cause of whicfi is beyond his conirol because: � � _ The hiyhest and best use of this site wouldn"t be possible for he is unable to aet •the 100 square feet he is short from adjacent property. The duplex would not create a hard- ship for other property owners in this vicinity. � 'PDI1;3 �1 . So as not to g�-ant a special privileye to me by the . gran�ing o. this v�izi�r.ce I submit the follo�•;inq conditions to be impos�d so as not to caus^ inconsistencies with the ].imitations upon otl:er • propert;a.es in the v9.cinity and zone in e�hich T am located. ' • I'd have no objection to others in the vicinity beina aranted a similar varience�_� , ' • , ` . � . , . . .