Laserfiche WebLink
BOARD OF Nh7USTl�ENT <br />FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER <br />VARIANCE NO. 7-89 <br />Based upon the writt�n request for a variance <br />zoning code by: <br />Jake Ruiter <br />1335 McDougall <br />Everett, WA 98201 <br />from the City�s <br />hereinafter referred to as "Applicant,'� for a variance from <br />E.:4.C. 19.16.050 (C), Rear Yards to allow the addition of a single <br />car garage to an existing single family home and provide a rear <br />yard setback of five feet rather than the twenty feet required by <br />code. <br />On the following described property: Lot 44, Temwalt Terrace Di- <br />vision No. 1 <br />Commonly known as: 1335 McDougall <br />The Board of Adjustment, following a public hearing on said ap- <br />plication held on May 1, 1989, and further having reviewed all <br />testimony, mak,as the following Findings, Conclusions and Order: <br />.I� � �.l! • �._ � . <br />Criter�on No 1• <br />That �here have been exceptional or extraordinary cir.cumstances <br />or conditions applying to the subject property or as to the in- <br />tended use thereof that do not apply generally to other proper- <br />ties in the same vicinity or zone. <br />a. <br />i� <br />Findina: The property consists of an existing single fam- <br />ily structure that was constructed in 1962 on an <br />approximately 630o square foot corner lot. The <br />house is oriented to the west towards McDougal; <br />however, the zoning code defines the front yard <br />as being to the north towards Jade Avenue since <br />that is the length of the lot. <br />The Applicant is proposing to construct a single <br />car attached garage on the south end of the ex- <br />isting single family structure that would be five <br />fest from the south property line . Since the <br />zoning code defines the south yard as the rear <br />yard the code requires a twenty foot setback in- <br />stead of the £ive feet the Applicant is propos- <br />ing. The house on the adjoining lot to the south <br />is also oriented towards McDougall so their side <br />yard would abut tbe five foot setback the appli- <br />cant is proposing which would function as a side <br />yard instead of a rear yard. <br />Conclusio�re There are unusual circumstances applying to the <br />subject property since it is a corner iot and <br />there is an existing single family structure on <br />the lot that is oriented to what is technically <br />the side yard but that is functioning eis a front <br />yard. In addition the side yard of the house to <br />the south abuts the portion of the subject lot <br />where the proposed garage will be constructed, so <br />the new construction will match the existing set- <br />back pattern (see Exhibit 4). <br />