Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br />PORT OF EVERETT <br />W MARINE VIEW DR <br />IMPROVEMENTS <br />CIP N0. 3A-003-09 <br />PROJECTNO. <br />PD•WM-20006-01 <br />accordance with Section 1-06.2(1), using a minimum of 91.0 percent of the reference maximum <br />density as detertnined by WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T 209. The re(erence maximum density <br />shall be determined as the moving average of the most recent five determinations for the lot of <br />HMA being placed. The specified level of density attained will be detertnined by the statistical <br />evaluation of five nuclear density gauge tests taken in accordance with WAQTC FOP TM 8 and <br />WSDOT SOP T 729 on the day the HMA is placed (after completion of the finish rollina) at <br />locations detertnined by ihe stratified random sampling procedure conforming to WSDOT Test <br />Method 716 within each density lot. The quantity represented by each densily lot will be no <br />grealer than a single day's production or 400 tons, whichever is less. The final lot tor each day of <br />paving may be increased to 600 tons. <br />The Engineer will fumish the Contractor with a copy of the results of all acceptance testing <br />performed wilhin one working day. Acceptance of pavement compaction will be based on the <br />statistical evaluation and CPF so determined. <br />For compaction lols talling below a 1.00 pay factor and thus subject to price reducGon or <br />rejection, cores may be used as an altemate to the nuclear density gauge tests. When cores are <br />taken by the Cont2cGng Agency at the request of the Contractor, they shall be requested by <br />noon of the next workday after paving. The cost for the coring expenses when the core results <br />indicate the specified level oF relative density within a lot has not been achieved, will be deducted <br />from any monies due or that may become due the Contractor under the contract at the rate of <br />$125 percore. • <br />At the start of paving, the Contractor must demonstrate to the Engineer that the HMA is <br />compactable by constructing compaction test section(s). Test section(s) shail be constructed <br />using the compaction train and a variety of rolling pattems that the Contractor expects to use in <br />the paving operation. A test section will be considered to have established compatibility, based <br />on the results of three densiry detertninations, when the average of the three tests exceeds <br />92 percent of Rice or when all three tests individually exceed 91 percent of Rice. This will require <br />consideration of the presence of a coRelation factor tor the nuclear gauge and may require final <br />resolution after the factor for the gauge is known. A minimum 1.00 compaction pay factor shall <br />be used until a gauge correlation factor is known, and until the HMA is considered compactable. <br />When construction of the lest section(s) has demonstrated that the HMA is not compactable, <br />paving must stop. To resume paving, all factors contributing to compaction shall be analyzed and <br />Engineer aaproved changes made, which may require a new mix design. When paving is <br />resumed, lhe Contractor must again, as previously defined, demonstrate that the HMA is <br />compactable. If the Contractor does not construct test section(s), the HMA is considered <br />compactable and all HMA placed will be evaluated according to Section 5-04.3(10)B. <br />HMA Class A, B, E, F, and G constructed under conditions other than listed above shall be <br />compacted on the basis of a test point evaluation of the compaction train. The test point <br />evaluation shall be performed in accordance with instructions from the Engineer. The number of <br />passes with an approved compaction train, required to attain the maximum test point density, <br />shall be used on all subsequent paving. <br />HMA Class D and preleveling HMA shall be compacted to the satisiaction of the Engineer. <br />in addilion to the randomly selected locations for tests of the density, the Engineer may also <br />isolate from a nortnal lot any area lhat is suspected of being defective in relative density. Such <br />isolated material will not include an original sample location. A minimum of 5 randomly located <br />Page 22 of 50 <br />