Laserfiche WebLink
, <br />' <br />' <br />, <br />, <br />' <br />July 30, 1997 <br />HWA Project No. 96028 <br />4.3.2 sronedwater <br />Groundwater was obsavcd in both boring� completed for this study, u dept6t � <br />from about 10'f. to i 8'h feet bdow the exiating ground surfacx. It is amidpued t6u <br />groundwater condidons will change in reaponae to aaeoq local wbs�uface coadidons, <br />ddal fluctuadons, and other fictors. Furthertno% the groundwater conditions reported on <br />the boring logs are for the speafic dates and locatione indicated, and tha�doro auy not <br />necessarily be indicative of other times and/or locations. <br />5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECO�NDATIONS <br />Based oa the rewlts of the Seld explorarioq laboratory testing, and engineering wly�a <br />' perfortned, it is our opinion that thc proposed new public access pier and tnnsiarc <br />moorage facility are feasible as plsnned from a geoteclmic,�l perspective, provided t6e <br />' recommendations presented in this report ue implaea�ted during design �nd conswction. <br />Recommendations related to seismic consideruions, pile foundation design, and pile <br />driving and con4tructability are provided below. <br />t5.1 SEI9MIC CON19mERATIONS <br />The project site Ges within Seismic Zone 3 as deSned in the Uniform Building Code <br />' (iJBC, 1994). Zonc 3 includes the Puget Sound regioq aed repraa►u �n area of <br />signi6cant seismic risk. CoaxqueMly, moderate levels of arthqueke �luldng �hodd be <br />' anticipated during the design life of the proposed improvements; however, the seismic ri� <br />at the project site is not considered greater than surrounding areas in the vicinity of the <br />' project site. As such, the proposed pubGc acce� pier and transient moorage fuality <br />should be designed to resist earthquake loading in accordance with the methodology <br />described in the 1994 edition of the UBC. <br />1 <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />t <br />, <br />Assuming the soil conditions observed in our explorations are representative of subsurface <br />conditions in the general vicinity of the project area, UBC Soil Profile S2 may be aswmed <br />for the project site. UBC Soil Profile Sz rc :es to a S Factor of 1.2 for u�e in detign. The <br />corresponding normalized response spectra for the assumed UBC Soil Profile is <br />considered adequate for the project site; however, if a site specific response spectra is <br />necessary for design, the geotechnical engineer should be consulted. <br />Liquefaction occurs when loose, saturated and relatively cohesionless soil deposits <br />temporarily lose strength as a result of earthquake shaldng. Primary factors controlling <br />the development of soil liquefaction include intensity and duration of ground motioq <br />characteristics of subsurface soil, in-situ stress conditions, and the depth to groundwata. <br />' 96036RF.D0�: <br />HoNo Wesrd Asaactnres, Iwc. <br />