Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' <br />I� <br />, <br />, <br />1 <br />1 <br />APPENDIX A <br />FIELD INVESTIGATION <br />Subsurface conditions were explorr� on April 11 and 12, 1996, under the fiill-time <br />observation of a HWA engineer. The exploration work consisted of d�illing and sempling <br />two exploratory borings (BH-1 and BH-2) at selected locadons within the project area. <br />The borings were advanced to depths ranging from about 61'h to 66'h feet bdow tl►e <br />eacisting ground surface. The borings were locatai appro�timately in the Seld by taping <br />distances from established site feadires and plotted on the Site Plan (Figure 2). A legend <br />to the terms and symbols used on the boring logs is presented on Figure A-1. Summary <br />logs of the exploratory borings are presented on Figures A-2 through A-5. <br />' Geotechnical drilling was performed by Gregory Drilling, Inc. of Redmond, Washington <br />under subcontract to HWA. The exploratory borings wero drilled with a truck-mounted, <br />CME 85 drill rig equipped with a trip-release mechanism for performing Standard <br />' Penetration Tests (SPT). The upper 20 feet of each boring was advanced using 6'h-inch <br />diart►eter, continuous flight hollow stem sugers. Beyond the upper 20 feet, the borings <br />' were advanced using mud rotary techniques. The mud rotary set-up included a 4inch <br />inside diameter steel casing advancer with a tri-cone bit. Upon completion of drilW�g, tl� <br />' borings wero backSlled with cuttings and bentonite chips. Explorations located in areas of <br />existing pavement were repaired using a quick-setting wncrete patch. <br />, As stated above, the hammer used to perfortn SPT sampling was equipped with an <br />automatic trip-release mechanism, which generally delivers a higher energy than a <br />"standard" hammer equipped with a rope and cathead mechanism. Based on previ�us <br />' studies (Skempton, 1986), a 79 percent energy ratio should be used in interpreting the <br />recorded SPT blow-counts obtained with a trip hammer, instead of the 60 percent atergy <br />ratio for a safety hammer with a rope and cathead system. As such, N-values measured <br />' with the automatic trip-release hammer should be multiplied by about 1.3 to convert them <br />to "standard" SPT N-values (N�). <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br />t <br />1 <br />At each boring location, SPT sampling was perfortned in general acc;ordance with <br />ASTM D 1586, using a 2-inch outside diameter split-spoon sampler and a 140-pound <br />hammer. During the test, samples were obtained by driving the sampler I8 inches into the <br />soil with a hammer free-falling 30 inches. The number of blows required for each 6 inches <br />of penetration was recorded. The Standard Penetration Resistance ("N-value") of the soil <br />was calculated as the number of blows required for the final 12 inches of peneuation. If a <br />total of 50 blows was recorded within a single 6 inch interval, the test was temtinated, and <br />v6ozat�.nac <br />A-1 <br />HoNa WFsr � Assoct�'rEs, Wc. <br />