2606 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� ; line to the i9est rather than the Code setback requ.irement ! of t�venty (20) feet. ' Legal Description: Lot 27, 2g, 7.g and 30 IIlock G11 Rucker's First n].zt, Addr.ess: 2G0G - 2G1G Rockefeller Avenue Mr. Russell abstained from comment at ihi, time and lef:t. the hearing. Mr. Egqe made the foll.owing statement-s: 1 2 3 There is very little chance of anym�re construc- tion on the adjo.ining lots. The proposed building would bc thirty (3U) feet from the neighUoring church lot to the South. Ile would build on lots 2II and 29 and have park- iny on lot 30. Mr. Jesse Sexon and P1r. Bd I�Terlick, representing tji� church to the south, were againsi- the granting of the variance for the following raasons: 1• Building to the alley would restrict access to ihe church r�r};ing and create congestion. 2. The church parking is limited and i,�ith the addition of apartments ihe proUlem would in- crease. 3. There are no buildings on the West side of the alley Lhat abut the property line. Aft-er reviewing the subject property and considcring all the facts and testimony it was moved by p1r. Berg, seconded by 61r. I<risti.ansen and unanimously carried to deny thc applicant's request for the following reasons: 1. There seem to be no apparent hardship sl�own L-y the applica�it. Z. Therc are alternative met-hods for developing the property. 3• I�n eight unit apartmenL- can be conslructed on the one hundred (100) foot oL frontage and be able to nieet all ci.ty standards. On motion thc meeting adjourned at 9:1� p.m. � , - _ � , %f � � ;.;.- Reid IL Shoc);ey; ,,,etre ary 13oard of Adjustment: r�