3209 ROCKEFELLER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

0. � �' i 9 ALL�G�1'1'IONS OF I�PPLICIINT I i POINT 1. '1'he f.ollowi.ng a�-e the special cir.cumstances cahich apo].y to my propea-ty tahich deprive me of rights and privileges whi.ch are j enjoyed by other properties in ihe vicinity under ihe identical zone classificatiwi. ' Applicant wishes to construct a building on the property, however, ten-foot side yard setbacks makes construction impractical. Other buildings in the zone, iahich were built prior to adoption of the R-5 zone, currentiv have five-foot side yard setbacks. POINT 2. The variance I am requc�ting c•;ill not be detrimental to the puUlic welfare or injurious �o the properties or i_mprovements in tlie vicinity of a zone i.n wliich my property is located because: Other tuildinQs in the zone, of similar nature as that proposed by aprlicant, currently have five-foot setliacks on the side yard, and tlie adjoining R-4 zones require only five-foot setbacks. POT_N`P 3. Tf this variance is not granted, an unnecessary harshi.p wil.l continue te the owner of this property, the cause of which is beyond hi� controlc bcoause: The sideyard setback requirements are so large that building on the remaining portion of the land becomes impractical. , POINT A. So as not to grant a special privilege to me Uy thc granLin9 oL- this variance T submit t-he follo��ring conditions to be imposed so as not to cause inconsistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in wl�ich I am located. Approvll of the variance could be conditioned upon limiting the 1?11].1SL1.Ilg to one floor of office snace.