My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2720 HOYT AVE LIBRARY PLACE 2018-11-28
>
Address Records
>
HOYT AVE
>
2720
>
LIBRARY PLACE
>
2720 HOYT AVE LIBRARY PLACE 2018-11-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2018 8:49:59 AM
Creation date
3/2/2017 2:35:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HOYT AVE
Street Number
2720
Tenant Name
LIBRARY PLACE
Notes
PHASE I CONSTRUCTION
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
538
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tony Lee <br /> From: Jeff Oaklief[joaklief@j-arch.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 2:23 PM <br /> To: Tony Lee <br /> Subject: Re: Library Place Construction Type <br /> Hi Tony, <br /> We are 33.65 feet from average grade plane with both building#3 and#4 (average grade plan is calculated at <br /> 207.75, roof height for both building#3 and#4 is 241.40). That should still put us under the code limit. Did <br /> you have a chance to talk to the Fire Department? I have a (possibly vague)memory that they were the ones <br /> who wanted the Type 5A construction. <br /> If things are ok with them, it sounds like we can change it to 5B. <br /> Let me know what you find out. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Jeff Oaklief, Architect <br /> JOHNSON ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING LLC <br /> 2124 Third Avenue <br /> Suite 200 <br /> Seattle, WA 98121 <br /> T: (206)448-7580 x14 <br /> F: (206)448-8977 <br /> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Tony Lee <TLeea,,ci.everett.wa.us>wrote: <br /> Jeff-starting to remember now-the height is measured from grade plane, not the plinth. So, you get 40 feet above <br /> grade plane(basic) plus 20 feet(for the sprinklers)for a total of 60 feet above grade plane for a Type V building. Does <br /> that work or are they too tall? <br /> From: Jeff Oaklief [mailto:joaklief@j-arch.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 10:09 AM <br /> To: Tony Lee <br /> Cc: Chuck Ogden <br /> Subject: Library Place Construction Type <br /> Tony, <br /> It appears that the construction type for Building#3 and Building#4 may have been erroneously set at Type <br /> 5A. I would like to see if you have any recollection about the construction types for these buildings, and why <br /> they might have been classified as 5A, when it appears that they would conform to type 5B. <br /> A quick analysis (assuming that the structure height is calculated from the Type lA podium deck): <br /> Building#3 <br /> Occupancy- R2 <br /> Proposed Area- 3340sf <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.