10405 3RD AVE SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

(3) The variance will only grant the subject property the same general rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the subject properfy. (4) The variar�ce is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the general rights described in Criteria 3 above. (5) The granting of the variance is not inconsistenl wilh the goals and policies of the Everetl general plan. (6) The need for lhe requested variance is not lhe result of a self- created hardship. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON FINDINGS -CODE VIOLATION 7. Stelmakhs are the owr,ers oi the property ot 104U5 - 3rd Avenue SE, Everett, Washina�on. (finding 1) 2. The zoning for the properry at 10405- 3rd Avenue SE, Everett, Washirglon, is R- 2, Single-Family Detacl�ed Medium Density. (finding 1) 3. The Stelmakhs did construciion by enlarging, altering, and changing lhe building on the property at 10405 - 3rd Avenue SE, Everelt, Washinc�ton. (finding 5) The constn�ction activity was done without securing a building permit. (linding ,0) 4. The construclion, which eniarged, altered, and changed the buiiding at 10405- 3rd Avenue SE, Everelt, Washington, resulled in ihe peak of the existing resi�ence to be raised io 33-feet, 8-inches. This height is in violation of EMC 19.0.010, Table 6.1 which establishes thal the maximurn permissible b��lding heighl witliin an R-2 zone is 28 (eel. (finding 9) CONCLUSIONS BASED ON FINDINGS -VHRIANCE 5. A variance was requested after the roof had been raised on the residence at the property at 10405 - �rd Avenue SE, Everett, Washington. (f,�nding 11) All of lhe criteria of EMC 19.d 1.130.0 must be satis(ied in order for a variance to be granled. 6. The variance would not be materially detrirnental lo the propeity in the area of ihe subject property or to the City as a whole. Because pioperlies in !F�e area have various zoning cl�signations and include sere buildings that are higher than the constructed residence on-si(e, Uiere would be no direct impact to other properties. (tinding 12) 7. There appears to be no excep!ional or exlraordinery circumstanr.es regarding the size, shape, topography, or iocalion uf lhe subject property. Although the Applicant has argued that other properties in the area have heights that are 0