Laserfiche WebLink
I'a�c 2 of 2 <br />more usable back yard in my proposal, it he does indeed intend to reside in the existir�� house. I'm not sure <br />r�hat Fire needs for a<cess and any tumaround, but it seemed trom il4ichaePs earlier er��,ail thr ac<css drive <br />�:: idths were ok as proposed. The only thin� that's changed really is some orientacion. i he critical areas <br />report has not heen submitted, so I am presuming there is not a buHer required. <br />I suggest we require a design revi;ion, and if the proponent �vishes not to do so he can either appeal or seek <br />a modifica;ion and or varian,c. <br />Niels <br />From: Ger�• Ervine <br />Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 5:07 Phi <br />To: N�els Tygesen <br />Subject: RE: Harvey plan for front house on 4th Ave W <br />That seems (ine to me. Steve was pretty familiar with the si[e, so run suggesUons by him. Let me know if you <br />need a referee, Gerry <br />From: Niels Tygesen <br />Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 4:50 P^1 <br />To: Steve Ingalsbe; Gerry Ervine <br />Subject: RE: Harvey plan for front house on 4th Ave �V <br />I missed this discussion in LU today, but we have the ability to require desion changes to better meet code <br />and guidelines in N1FDG&5 so if they bring the house more fonvard to the street, re-orient the garage <br />entrance as zhown on the attached pdf and essentially treat the project like a short plat, access, open space, <br />orientation, reducing cunc �uts to protect pedestrian satety, I think it'd be a better end proiect. <br />From: Steve Ingalsbc <br />Sent: Tuesday, May t0, 2011 4:04 PM <br />To: Gerry Ervinc <br />Ce: Niels Tygesen <br />Subject: Harvcy plan (or front house on 9tii Avc \4� <br />ht� /!v✓w�v hdplans com�llD,IobShow asp^NavID=1_367 <br />'"lZ <br />;iivzot i <br />