My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6014 4TH DR W 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
4TH DR W
>
6014
>
6014 4TH DR W 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 5:19:19 PM
Creation date
3/7/2017 11:51:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
4TH DR W
Street Number
6014
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Select Homes <br />237 Elm Street <br />: verett, Washington 98203 <br />Attendon: Mr. Randy Clark <br />_".. ; � C �l 1� ; � .r n :? � ? <br />� {.� 1 f,� r <br />. . . . _ . 7 • � ` 1 <br />�.' : S :,� � <br />AFR ; � 1993 `"'� <br />April 19, 1943 "CITY OF EVERET�co'technical, <br />Public Works Dept.Geoenvironmentnland <br />Geologic Se�vices <br />Building Setback Conditions <br />Nanabrook Development <br />Divisions III and IV <br />Everett, Washington <br />File No. 2670-0OS-R06 <br />The purpose of this leuer is to oudine reduced building setback conditions for location of <br />homes at tSe tops of slopes on Divisions III and N of the Hanabrook Development in Everett, <br />Washington. 1Lis 6as been discussed with Mr. Randy Clazk of Selecc Homes, Mr. Pat McCourt <br />of Universal Brokerage Corporation, and Mr. Michabl Crowson of W&H Pacific. <br />We Lave obsaved no signs of instability on native slopes in Divisions III and IV. Fiil <br />slopes on Divisions III and IV were consavcted with suuctural fill consisting of on-site granulaz <br />soils under fu11-time moniWring of a qualified individual from our ficm. The stiuctural fill is <br />�eY� �� ��Wg firm native soils and fip placed tc .ichieve the final slope grades has been <br />properly benched into existing native materials and compacted to 95 percent of I�IDD (mazimum <br />dry density) accarding to the specifications of the ASTM D-1557 test procedure. In addition, the <br />lou ate graded to slope away from the tops of slopes and al� slopes have been covered with jute <br />matting and hydroseaded for erosion protection. <br />In our opinion, where slopes have been piaced, compacted, graded, and vegetated as <br />described above, the minimum building setback distance can be reduced to 10 feet. The setback <br />distance is the horizontal distance measured from the front face of the footing to the face of the <br />�'�pe. It should be understood that if the setback distance is reduced to 10 feet, the risks of <br />losing access, teducing the design life of the foundations and 5avin� slope movement impaM tt�e <br />house foundations ue increased. <br />GmEnginmrs, inc. <br />KfIO 154ih Arcrmc N.F.. <br />Redmond,�'d 98052 <br />Tclephonc (2W) 3GI�i000 <br />Far (206) 861-GOSO <br />naim �, �a��i�a wce�. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.