Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />z <br />3 <br />4 <br />S <br />G <br />7 <br />8 <br />�� <br />10 <br />11 <br />l2 <br />l3 <br />14 <br />l5 <br />l6 <br />17 <br />i li <br />19 <br />2U <br />2l <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />2G <br />27 <br />�y <br />��� <br />3u <br />31 <br />3? <br />33 <br />34 <br />3S <br />iG <br />i7 <br />IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE S`1'AT� OF WASHINGTON <br />IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH <br />OTTO S. MEYER and LEAmRICE E. <br />MEYER, his wife, <br />Plaintiffs, <br />v. <br />CITY OF EVERETT, a minicipal <br />corooration, and its Board of <br />Adjustment and DENNIS V. <br />DIEDRICH, <br />Defendants <br />N0. 83-2-03840-3 <br />JUDGMGNT <br />THIS MATTER having come on for trial on the 3rd day of May, <br />1984, Plaintiffs appearing in person and being represented by <br />their counsel, Derrill T. Bastian, Defendants, City of Everett, <br />appearing by and through the assistant City Attorney, James D. <br />Zles and the Defendant, Dennis V. Diedrich appearing in person <br />and being represented by his attorney, Joseph H. Brinster; the <br />iCourt having fully reviewed the return to the ��rit of Certiorari <br />submitted by the City of Everett and having listened to the <br />argument of counsel explaining the point of view of the Plaintif <br />and the Defenda:�ts regarding the issues involved in the Writ of <br />Certiorari; and the Court having made and entered its written <br />Findings of Fa.:t and Con:l.usions of Law and being fully advised <br />in the premises, now therefore, <br />IT IS HERE6Y ORDERED, ADJUDG6D AND DECREED as follows: <br />i. <br />That the affidavit and petition for Writ of Certiorari of <br />the Plaintiffs be and the same is hereby granted and the dec- <br />Judgment - 1 <br />11W l�ll�ll ti <br />DERRILL T BASTIAN <br />,�oin„i �niu,:.i.n „u�.�um.�e.� <br />1l1�'• 1111)Ir� :.IN(l l � W <br />�l�il11Y1:�/I) N�SI�INu1lIN vtlVJu <br />��11Y� ))!�nufll <br />